Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: weight your food before or after cooking?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,143

    weight your food before or after cooking?

    Finally bought a scale and im going to start weighing my food. But I dont know if I should weight meat before or after cooking? For example, the steak I just bought says there are 21g of protein in 4oz... is that 4oz cooked or 4oz uncooked?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,024
    Before cooked.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    7,888
    weigh mine before, rice gets bigger, meats get smaller.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    17,443
    Typically, almost all nutritional info assumes raw/dry weight. I weigh everything raw and/or dry (rice, pasta, etc.) as the cooked weights will change drastically and throw your macros off considerably.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    17,170
    Excellent, we haven't had this question for a month.

    Same answer as above, uncooked.
    NO SOURCES GIVEN

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by gbrice75 View Post
    Typically, almost all nutritional info assumes raw/dry weight. I weigh everything raw and/or dry (rice, pasta, etc.) as the cooked weights will change drastically and throw your macros off considerably.
    This^^^. Raw rice and oatmeal are especially off if you weigh them after cooking bc of all the water they absorb.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Back In Black View Post
    Excellent, we haven't had this question for a month.

    Same answer as above, uncooked.
    hahaha....

    ~T

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    48
    Im not sure I agree with this. I weigh my meat after cooking which I thought was correct. Rice is weighed dry as it just absorbs water when cooked but meats weigh less after cooking which I thought was because theres water present before cooking. 500grams of chicken can weigh less than 400grams after cooking! Am I wrong in thinking that?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee
    Posts
    2,717
    Quote Originally Posted by staygroovy
    Im not sure I agree with this. I weigh my meat after cooking which I thought was correct. Rice is weighed dry as it just absorbs water when cooked but meats weigh less after cooking which I thought was because theres water present before cooking. 500grams of chicken can weigh less than 400grams after cooking! Am I wrong in thinking that?
    You are correct in the fact that your meats will weigh less after they are cooked, but the only lose water not their macro content. All labeled nutritional info is based on the raw uncooked weights of any given food.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    17,443
    Quote Originally Posted by staygroovy
    Im not sure I agree with this. I weigh my meat after cooking which I thought was correct. Rice is weighed dry as it just absorbs water when cooked but meats weigh less after cooking which I thought was because theres water present before cooking. 500grams of chicken can weigh less than 400grams after cooking! Am I wrong in thinking that?
    Meats generally contain 6g protein per raw oz. so, 6oz of raw chicken contains roughly 36g protein. If you cook that chicken it may wind up weighing 4oz, but the protein content hasn't changed, is has only lost water.

    Using your method, you'd say that same piece of chicken provides 24g of protein - and you'd be wrong.

    Make this mistake several times daily, and your macros will wind up being way off.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •