Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Simeon Panda Cycle History Guess?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,562

    Simeon Panda Cycle History Guess?

    Hey guys, I thought it would be fun to see what do you guys think Simeon Panda's cycle history looks like?
    He's 26yr, 6.1, 230lbs.
    How many cycles do you guys think he has done.
    What do you think his cycle lay out looks like. Cycle by Cycle.
    Calories Intake: Protein, Carbs, Fats
    He tells everyone that he is a natty. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1393366_593911504004867_1154786145_n.jpg 
Views:	126054 
Size:	82.7 KB 
ID:	149410

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,028
    He his not doing any cycle...

    He is certainly cruising and blasting.

    Test year round for sure.

    Fitness dude lkke him use lots of tren and anything that can help them stay shredded.

    Clen/T3/var/winstrol/primobolan/masteron, you name it...

    Some of them also use cocain as preworkout. Which is stupid as **** in itself, but worst they mix it with clen and tren...

    Their is no way to know what he took or takes.

    Their is more than one way to reach that.(for him)
    Genetic play a bigger role on how he look that anything else.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    395
    Then again he has been training for over 10 years. Very possible to obtain that look with 10 years of hard training and a very strict and clean diet. If he is natty I don't see him getting much bigger than that. Maybe he could add on 10 more pounds of muscle in the next 5 years if he is natty but not much more weight than that
    Last edited by ChestNBack; 03-24-2014 at 12:46 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,826
    He may be natty as there are genetic wonders out there.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    There's no way in hell he's remotely natural. But then again... test, nandrolone, and GH are all naturally produced by the body if you're playing semantics. Lol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,028
    Quote Originally Posted by ChestNBack View Post
    Then again he has been training for over 10 years. Very possible to obtain that look with 10 years of hard training and a very strict and clean diet. If he is natty I don't see him getting much bigger than that. Maybe he could add on 10 more pounds of muscle in the next 5 years if he is natty but not much more weight than that
    Cmon there is no ****ing way he is natural, even with the greatest training and diet and genetik on the planet.

    If he were natural no one would know his name cause he couldnt get over steroid user, he could not get ready for the photoshoot in time every time. Cause naturally it takes time to get that lean and its impossible to stay that lean naturally.

    It is extremely credule.of your part to think the he may be natural.

    Very simple rules here:
    If he wins enough money to live from his body he is on gear.
    If he his widely known for his physic, he his on gear.
    If he stay mostly shredded year round, he is on gear.

    There is no way aroung it.

    When a magazine looks for a model they have choice over hundreds of men, how in the ****ing hell do you want the natty one to surpass every other gear user while being able to stay shredded year round...

  7. #7
    No hes not natty. But could he be at certain times of the year absolutely.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    upper midwest
    Posts
    4,197
    If he is natty he is a genetic wonder of the world.

  9. #9
    natty ^_^ ??? lol

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    395
    Dude because he has abs that makes him really lean and on gear. Bro its no way that kid is under 9 percent. You can see abs with about 14 percent bodyfat. You ever see young kids who play sports with abs. Thats because they are usually really lean for a combination of reasons. Because you were too lazy to put in 10 years worth of training and dieting and because your genetics suck you assume that he is running gear. You guys act like he is 280 and shredded. Come on 210 or 230 is very obtainable at his height. He is like 6 feet. Before I ever ran my first cycle people asked me if I was on gear and that was only after three years of hard work in the gym with no AAS. Reality check he could very well be natural, it only took him 10 short and quick years to get there. Some of you guys doubting are the guys who run a ton of gear and still look like shyt. Its that mindset that will never allow you to look like him because you are already mentally defeated and feel you have to use gear to look like that. You are the guy in the red shirt standing behind Simeon in that picture (The average joe) who will forever be behind him because of the way you think. If you had the right mindest the gear you are running would have you looking bigger and freakier than Simeon every will. Phil heath has been training for about 10 years. You see the difference between the two. Come on
    Last edited by ChestNBack; 03-26-2014 at 12:33 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    A world without islam!!!!
    Posts
    7,092
    Who cares. A physique is a physique

  12. #12
    Obviously not natty but again who cares. It's just a shame seeing these guys preach 'hardwork and dedication got me here'
    and their whole legion of fans believe it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    Quote Originally Posted by ChestNBack View Post
    Then again he has been training for over 10 years. Very possible to obtain that look with 10 years of hard training and a very strict and clean diet. If he is natty I don't see him getting much bigger than that. Maybe he could add on 10 more pounds of muscle in the next 5 years if he is natty but not much more weight than that
    100% not natty. It's comical to even entertain the idea of natty. It seems like every week some 230lb 7% bodyfat guy is natural! is there a factory producing these genetic mutants that defy all of science ? Not a knock on him at all, guy has what most men would consider the perfect physique, very frank Zane esque, just bigger

    Hey tice, your back is looking insane
    Last edited by Machdiesel; 03-26-2014 at 07:31 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    395
    I'm not a fan of this dude. If he cycles he cycles. I cycle, who cares. But don't shyt on this dude and say he cycles because you ****ing suck

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,826
    Like I said, he may very well be natty. Most likely he is not very big in person. These natural guys can look great in pics, but throw a shirt on him and hes quite average.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,096
    Height/weight/bodyfat always tells the real story. His stats say he's cycled , it's a fact

  17. #17
    He's as natty as a Twinkie.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    7,888
    Quote Originally Posted by AshopRep View Post
    Like I said, he may very well be natty. Most likely he is not very big in person. These natural guys can look great in pics, but throw a shirt on him and hes quite average.
    Exactly. His delts aren't quite that of a juicer. But I'd still say he wasn't natty. Just too much lbm if he is really 230lb on stage. Looks more like 190-200 stage weight.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,826
    Guys think that just because they couldn't get to a certain level natural, that others cant also.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,741
    He looks ridiculous.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •