Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Tren and test question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The land down under.
    Posts
    359

    Tren and test question

    Hey guys,
    Planning my next cycle and have been reading for the past month on tren and how to cycle without I get lost and caught up in the long debate of
    Low test , high tren
    High tren , low test
    And what I gathered from most is that :
    The high test low tren cycles had more of muscle gain and the low test high tren had less muscle gain but a lot more fat melting

    So my question today is..
    If I run tren for 12 weeks and do
    1-8 high test low tren , eat in a surplus
    Then
    8-12 low test high tren, eat in a deficient

    Will this be a good bulk/cut heading into summer ( because I'm Aussie )

    Or should I just pick one or the other and let the diet just do it's work ??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,489

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    1,147
    That is a stellar article! Thanks for the link Frank13!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The land down under.
    Posts
    359
    Cheers for the article brother , but I have read it plenty of times, but I have read plenty of others though as well, think I'll take the dive and do high tren over test

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    dont ask for a source thx
    Posts
    8,949
    which ever way you choose realize that your diet and training will dictate the true results not the compounds themselves imho...and your idea of 8 weeks bulk then the rest cutting isn't going to pan out like you are thinking most likely I would just choose one or the other and be consistent through out...good luck...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The land down under.
    Posts
    359
    Thanks ghetto, decision is made. appreciate it, following yet again another good article from here is always the right choice

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,489
    Quote Originally Posted by Haydenz View Post
    Cheers for the article brother , but I have read it plenty of times, but I have read plenty of others though as well, think I'll take the dive and do high tren over test
    Yes I would do a very low test

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    With the 100 lb plates.
    Posts
    1,912
    I've tried various combinations of tren and test and I get my best results with the lowest sides when the cycle is low test and high tren. Sides are easily managed and I get very good gains. The only real issue I have is eating enough as my appetite is nonexistent with tren.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Proud Bostonian
    Posts
    4,722
    What are your stats? I think that is a good barometer in terms of more tes then tren or vice versa. I have done both and think there are pros and cons to each.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    The land down under.
    Posts
    359
    Hey ill throw my stats in

    28
    83kgs
    15%
    5.10
    training for 6 years , competed 4 times
    Diet is flawless, I have a coach and a nutritionist
    Goals would be as i am a competitor is to come first in the next Arnold classic i compete in and become pro
    Last edited by Haydenz; 09-29-2014 at 09:14 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •