http://press.endocrine.org/doi/abs/1...RE.12.SUN-0056
very interesting 2014 study, thoughts?
http://press.endocrine.org/doi/abs/1...RE.12.SUN-0056
very interesting 2014 study, thoughts?
Very interesting results related to the varying numbers. It would be interesting to know where the sub q injection sight was since many on this board have stated that location of the injection site makes a difference with their readings.
I will say that my sub q @ 100mg/week split 2X/week did not give me a sense of well being in comparison to how I felt with the same approach via IM. Perhaps this study explains my experience given the swing in numbers when you compare a 1 time 100mg dose/week.
I also recall reading blood work results from those on this forum when they compared IM vs Sub Q, and the majority had higher levels via IM. I wonder if the large Sub Q dose is the way to know given the study results
Last edited by ripped_82; 11-10-2014 at 03:31 AM.
While an interesting product, the last paragraph presents one basis of the study which is; to avoid "treatment-related mood swings" observed with IM on a 1-2 times per month schedule. These idiots are ignoring the bio-availability of Test E from the get-go. No worthwhile practitioner today would prescribe Test E on such an outdated dosing model and they also make the assumption that we as patients cant possibly perform IM injections ourselves. It reads like a half-ass study funded by the developers of Novel Jet-Injector...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)