
Originally Posted by
DocToxin8
For advanced bodybuilders I'd think blast/cruise be the norm,
but that doesn't mean it impossible to both recover after 20 week cycles.
Actually I've seen several examples of 20+ week lead to recovery,
but many of these individuals had the thinking that "if I end up needing TRT I don't really care", and many of them didn't even base recovery on blood work but rather whether they recovered libido. (They generally did bloodwork, but excluded hormones from the BW to "hide" AAS use from their doctors, so one can only say they were fine in terms of kidney and liver function and lipids.)
Going by just libido alone is a very poor indicator of T levels, so in many such cases it's hard to tell. Some did eventually test T levels and found they had recovered though.
My thinking is that the body is quite amazing at recovering,
and even some long blasts/cruises can often lead to recovery,
but it can take quite some time and each time you do it increases the chance it won't lead to recovery.
Shorter time on is IMO much safer in regards to your HPTA than +12 week cycles.
Worth it?
Problem is that even with low T it's possible to maintain mass,
(At least medium low T which is where most will end up)
so as far as gaining muscle then long cycles might be worth it yes.
Health wise though, shorter cycles are the way to go.
I would really be hesitant to consider long cycles,
and would advice against it, possible exceptions being when older,
done with children, and truly dedicated to the lifestyle.
It's never a good idea to start using, and really never a good idea to blast/cruise, it's just a choice between the lesser of evils.