I am still reading on the mk 766 and wondering which of the 2 would yield lean mass gains and minimal sides,thanks
I am still reading on the mk 766 and wondering which of the 2 would yield lean mass gains and minimal sides,thanks
You're not going to see "MASSIVE GAINS!!!," on either alone, or with only those two together. ...it's not as if someone else never thought of it. "Massive Gains," is not synonymous with anything else in that sentence. You're just going to have to make decisions which exclude prioritizing everything at the same level.
there is no comparison..
thats like saying,, what exercise is going to get me the biggest forearms possible , bench press vs squats . thats retarded, there is no relation.
don't compare these two compounds.. if all else, take them both
OP if you don't mind me asking how old are you?
That q tells me ull be better off studying how to do squats and bench correctly and how much protein u need.
Sorry bro, just tough love.
Sent fra min BLA-L29 via Tapatalk
I would take Anavar over a chemical that hasn’t been well researched and we don’t have long term studies on, as far as I know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
396 Pages of Anabolic Steroid resources, techniques and facts. Discover the best types of Steroids to use to reach specific goals and outcomes.