I see in older threads that this site was referred to as AR for short. What was this meant to stand for?
Just curious
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I see in older threads that this site was referred to as AR for short. What was this meant to stand for?
Just curious
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Anabolic Review
There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
Ass Rocket
That must be that guy from that mtv show who used to ride the shopping carts over a cliff
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by almostgone; 06-21-2020 at 02:42 PM.
There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
Absolutely. Brilliant. That is the issue in a nutshell.
They persecute that rifle, wanting to eliminate it from society, based solely on it's looks, not what it can do. Compare it to the Mini-14. Same caliber, same round capacity, same knockdown power. Yet, based on its looks, it is not subject to being banned.
Its an example of what happens when you dont have subject matter experts involved in writing laws.
Would those assholes write stock market or bank legislation without the input of finance industry folks? Of course not.
Would they write legislation that regulates the medical industry without input from medical professionals? No way.
How about legislation related to mine safety? Will they have any experts on mining giving input? Sure.
SO then why do they just wing it and try to write gun control legislation without any input from subject matter experts? Banning a rifle based on its visual appearance alone is absurd. But its what happens when you dont have anybody from the field of firearms giving direction and advice on potential legislation.
And its why the industry will always stay a few steps ahead of them, creating guns that are functionally equivalent to banned models, but do not fit the requirements necessary to actually be banned.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)