Thread: Liddell-Jackson II
-
03-19-2007, 01:28 AM #1
Liddell-Jackson II
May 26th!! Who ya got?
-
03-19-2007, 01:42 AM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Posts
- 141
I would bet probably Liddell, because he strikes me as the better overall fighter
-
03-19-2007, 01:42 AM #3Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Posts
- 141
Even though Jackson has won a match against Liddell, I believe it probably won't happen again.
-
03-19-2007, 01:43 AM #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- U.S.A.
- Posts
- 141
Then again Dana White said Liddell has been ill lately. Pneumonia? Would that hurt Liddell's chances. Dunno
-
03-19-2007, 01:51 AM #5
We shall see how Rampage is in his next fight. He is probably one of the most athletic guys Chuck has faced.
-
03-19-2007, 04:12 AM #6
Rampage is going to rag him i hope
-
03-19-2007, 05:59 AM #7
I hate to say it but i think Liddell will most likely lose his belt.
-
03-19-2007, 07:17 AM #8
Rampage.....all The Way....beat Him Once ...he Can Do It Again.....chucks Been Sick.....every Dog Has His Day....my Vote Is For The Good Ol Tennessee Boy...
-
03-19-2007, 07:20 AM #9Associate Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- houston
- Posts
- 184
liddell by ko. Then again, randy made me look like an idiot when he walked through tim. Mabe rampage will pull off the upset.
-
03-19-2007, 08:47 AM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Rampage has a very good chance,liddell does not have the effective clinch game that is needed to beat Rampage.Plus I`m going with series,liddell run has to end.
-
03-19-2007, 09:06 AM #11
Easy win for liddell...
-
03-19-2007, 09:23 AM #12
Cant wait for rampage to dump him on his back
-
03-19-2007, 09:23 AM #13
It's a shame that UFC won't respect Rampage's wishes and give him another tune-up fight. Then again, it makes you wonder why they would give him a title belt fight with Liddell considering that he only had a 2 fight contract. What happens if he wins? He could leave and go back to Pride, which makes me think that he already has something in the works with UFC. If he loses, UFC could easily get rid of him which would be a shame and another instance of UFC showing their muscle to get rid of a good, solid fighter. Although, I think he'll have a multi-fight contract signed before this fight ever takes place.
-
03-19-2007, 09:24 AM #14
Oh...and as far as who wins...I think Chuck will take it if the Quinton which came out against Marvin comes out. If Quinton comes in lose and relaxed and does what he does, then there may be the change of guard.
-
03-19-2007, 10:58 AM #15
IM a chuck fan, considering i trained with him (lol if u havent noticed, i drop that in every post here hah). I want rampage to win though. BUT i highly doubt that will happen, rampage is not his old self anymore judging from the Eastman fight. I speculate it will end in a decision for chuck, sparking talks of a third fight.
-
03-19-2007, 11:00 AM #16Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 597
chuck all the way
-
03-19-2007, 11:06 AM #17Originally Posted by soo2bhuge
I'd be willing to bet that Dana White will not get rid of Rampage. He's going to do everything in his power to keep him there and he's going to try to bring more fighters to the UFC. If Liddell does somehow win this fight Dana will keep Rampage because they will have there rubber match. Dana would have rampage fight some no name fighters a couple of times and give him his third fight with liddell after that.
-
03-19-2007, 11:28 AM #18Originally Posted by rar1015
-
03-19-2007, 11:35 AM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,096
i like rampage, he's definitely going to be one of the fan favorites and brings a bit of excitement that some of the others don't bring. it would be a shame for the ufc to dump him.
-
03-19-2007, 11:49 AM #20
I'll bet if he beats Liddell that Dana will still have them fight again just because Liddell lost to him in pride and not in the UFC.
-
03-19-2007, 02:18 PM #21
Liddell be to impressive since he lost against Ramgage the first time around.
Jackson lost couple of times since is win against liddell against top talent.
This is one fight i am gonna sit down and enjoy has an MMA fan i dont want to choose a winner on this one to hard.
-
03-19-2007, 03:24 PM #22
to quote the mean asian man who breaks bruce lees back in The Dragon
"I beat him b4! I beat him again!"
really though, it could easilly go either way i think.
-
03-19-2007, 03:36 PM #23
As far as Rampage said he beat him once, Ill beat him again....just like the shit he talked about after he won Wandy's belt,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,allthough the interveiw was funny.
Im going with Chuck, Rampage's defense has been shitty as if late, taking many shots, he wont take many of Chucks. Rampage is half the fighter he used to be imo.
Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
Everything was impossible until somebody did it!
I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!
It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.
Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html
-
03-19-2007, 03:39 PM #24
ya, i think they are giving him the fight in case he pulls a Wandy and loses a few, thus plummetting his stock before UFC fans can even get to know him.
-
03-19-2007, 09:06 PM #25
Chuck IMO should take this and I cant wait 4 this fight. I think Chucks the better striker and I dont c rampage being able to take him down. Im hoping that if chuck wins no 1 uses excuses about how rampage would of won if he got 1 more tune up match. No matter who wins it should be a great fight. Also theres no way ufc will let rampage sign n e where else and rampage has stated hes gonna be in the ufc for a long time and plus hes loving the spotlight.
-
03-20-2007, 08:06 AM #26
If anyone's going to take Chuck down its going to be Rampage.
-
03-20-2007, 08:52 AM #27Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,096
Originally Posted by rar1015
-
03-20-2007, 09:12 AM #28
Brandon Vera's a d-bag and i'd bet my life savings (which isnt much) that he wouldnt beat chuck.
-
03-20-2007, 11:44 AM #29Associate Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- ny
- Posts
- 256
lets be honesty it could easily go either way. i like both fighters. with that said chuck has only gotten better since he lost to rampage, but him being sick and all. well all just have to see
-
03-20-2007, 12:55 PM #30Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Louisiana
- Posts
- 1,111
Rampage is just after the $$$$. He said it himself that he'd rather be rapping than doing anything related to MMA. Wandy beat the sport out of him. My hard earned money is on Chuck even though Quinton is my favorite fighter.
-
03-20-2007, 01:23 PM #31Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- sonoma county
- Posts
- 455
it will be liddell by ko
-
03-20-2007, 01:28 PM #32
Chuck has improved dramatically since then but you guys forget the only losses Rampage has since he beat chuck was silvax2, and shogun. Wow he lost to two of the top three guys. Now lets look here both very aggressive and utilize the clinch. Chuck is not aggressive and does not have half of the clinch game shogun or wandy possess. Now on to the Marvin Eastman fight Eastman is a very good muay thai striker and has fought K1, he is no push over. Rampage Tko'ed him. Rampage has a very good chance of beating chuck I would 70% 30%
Last edited by Hunter; 03-20-2007 at 01:36 PM.
-
03-20-2007, 01:40 PM #33Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,096
whatever happened to the wandy/liddel fight that was supposed to go down a while back?
-
03-20-2007, 03:05 PM #34
Chuck, third round tko. I don't really see why Rampage would need any more tune up fights, he has been fighting top level competition for a long time.
-
03-20-2007, 03:53 PM #35Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Louisiana
- Posts
- 1,111
Originally Posted by pepperoni
-
03-20-2007, 07:00 PM #36Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 597
anyone got hand on the first fight?
-
03-20-2007, 07:01 PM #37Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 597
nevermin I got it...
-
03-20-2007, 07:12 PM #38Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Louisiana
- Posts
- 1,111
Originally Posted by wishmasterATM
-
03-21-2007, 05:58 AM #39Originally Posted by swole25
Good god, do we have to talk about this again?
-
03-21-2007, 07:58 AM #40Originally Posted by mn_fighter
Last edited by BG; 03-21-2007 at 08:00 AM.
Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
Everything was impossible until somebody did it!
I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!
It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.
Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS