Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: BF calipers accurate

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115

    BF calipers accurate

    Are calipers an accurate measurement tool. Someone on here said they were junk.

    I know that a bod pod or hydrostatic test are more accurate. But I do not have access to them. So I was going to use the pinch type analog calipers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    3,366
    Quote Originally Posted by boostjunkie09
    Are calipers an accurate measurement tool. Someone on here said they were junk.

    I know that a bod pod or hydrostatic test are more accurate. But I do not have access to them. So I was going to use the pinch type analog calipers.
    Not even close to being accurate, ur bf % can change 5-10% just from a different person doing it

    -Chomp Chomp Chomp-Clink Clink Clink-

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115
    So I guess I'll just forget it. And just get as lean as possible. What about electronic? We have those to. But I know that being dehydrated or water retention throws them off as well. Any suggestions?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    And those hand held gizmo's or the ones you stand on are no better.

    Bodpod seems to be accurate.

    http://www.uoguelph.ca/bodycomp/bodpod.html

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Blighty
    Posts
    17,170
    Or you can post pics here, we are just as accurate as calipers.
    NO SOURCES GIVEN

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Back In Black View Post
    Or you can post pics here, we are just as accurate as calipers.
    Ok sounds good will post up some pictures soon. I'm only two weeks into my cutting phase. Probably around 12-15% right now.

    I guess the members picture forum would be the best place?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Where do you feel you are compared to this template?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BF Men.jpg 
Views:	3389 
Size:	322.4 KB 
ID:	137031

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by boostjunkie09 View Post
    Are calipers an accurate measurement tool. Someone on here said they were junk.

    I know that a bod pod or hydrostatic test are more accurate. But I do not have access to them. So I was going to use the pinch type analog calipers.
    Using BF calipers is a skill just like using a knife sharpening stone;

    just because you have the knife sharpening stone doesn't mean you know how to use it properly or that if you do use it your knife will get the "razor's" edge you are looking for.

    You can get reasonably accurate measurements with calipers, but you will need to practice, and consistancy is key.

    The more points you check, the better approximation you will get.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Times Roman View Post
    Using BF calipers is a skill just like using a knife sharpening stone;

    just because you have the knife sharpening stone doesn't mean you know how to use it properly or that if you do use it your knife will get the "razor's" edge you are looking for.

    You can get reasonably accurate measurements with calipers, but you will need to practice, and consistancy is key.

    The more points you check, the better approximation you will get.
    Agreed. You can get a fairly accurate measurement if the individual measuring knows how to do it. You're also right about using more pinch points but I would say you can at least get a fairly accurate determination regarding BF going up or down using a 3 point test on a regular basis but 7-9 is better for a true reading.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,065
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    Where do you feel you are compared to this template?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BF Men.jpg 
Views:	3389 
Size:	322.4 KB 
ID:	137031
    That pic is an OK gauge but it can also be misleading. I've had guys who were fairly lean up top, easily in the 12% range just by going by the top but when BF is actually measured they end up being over 15. Lower body has to be taken into account. Granted, most men hold most of their fat in their upper body. Personally I hold almost no fat in my lower body but everyone's different.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    ^^ Agreed.

    Its simply a guideline for members who have little knowledge on BF%.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	003.JPG 
Views:	830 
Size:	485.0 KB 
ID:	137041Click image for larger version. 

Name:	004.JPG 
Views:	809 
Size:	452.2 KB 
ID:	137043Click image for larger version. 

Name:	007.JPG 
Views:	519 
Size:	469.4 KB 
ID:	137044
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    Where do you feel you are compared to this template?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BF Men.jpg 
Views:	3389 
Size:	322.4 KB 
ID:	137031
    I think I'm between 14-18%. The electro scale says 14.5

    I'm 6' 1/2" tall and 209lb. Small bone structure.

    Be easy on me I just started cutting two weeks ago.

    Also finishing up my creatine, so I'm holding some water I think.

    I'm all natural so far. And have been training for three years.
    Last edited by boostjunkie09; 04-09-2013 at 01:09 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,976
    Multicompartment models are the most accurate way to measure BF% they can include DXA measurement of bone, plus independent measures of body water and body volume. They are extremely expensive and not convenient.

    Bodpods are cheap, convenient and very accurate. Being able to find one is the main problem.

    BIA is not a very accurate way to estimate body fat percentage. Hydration level is an important source of error in determining the flow of the electric current to estimate body fat.

    Calipers are cheap and extremely helpful when determining BF%. It is important to test in a precise location with a fixed pressure. Times roman is correct the more skilled you are at using the device and ensuring that you measure the same locations the more accurate the results. The accuracy is more dependent on a person's unique body fat distribution than on the number of sites measured.
    Last edited by tigerspawn; 04-10-2013 at 04:50 PM.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Metalject View Post
    That pic is an OK gauge but it can also be misleading. I've had guys who were fairly lean up top, easily in the 12% range just by going by the top but when BF is actually measured they end up being over 15. Lower body has to be taken into account. Granted, most men hold most of their fat in their upper body. Personally I hold almost no fat in my lower body but everyone's different.
    Agree with this. I am the same way. Most of my BF is lower body........specifically my penis!!!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,065
    Quote Originally Posted by canesfan804 View Post
    Agree with this. I am the same way. Most of my BF is lower body........specifically my penis!!!
    I understand. It makes buying pants extremely difficult.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    blue trunks
    Posts
    3,095
    For those of you "holding fat in your legs" it usually just means your legs muscle are under developed and your legs look soft.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Back from Afghanistan
    Posts
    27,376
    Quote Originally Posted by canesfan804 View Post
    Agree with this. I am the same way. Most of my BF is lower body........specifically my penis!!!
    I see someone is still practicing their positive affirmations? =)

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    ^^ Agreed.

    Its simply a guideline for members who have little knowledge on BF%.
    Yep , yep agree again. ...crazy mike

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,065
    Quote Originally Posted by hankdiesel View Post
    For those of you "holding fat in your legs" it usually just means your legs muscle are under developed and your legs look soft.
    I don't know, that could be the case sometimes but not all the time. I had one training partner years ago who struggled with lower body fat, not common in too many men but it's where he stored it. Anyway, when shredded down his legs were pretty solid, better than average while a lot of his upper body was weaker in development. Anyway, I would suspect this is more of a hormonal issue than anything else.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115
    [QUOTE=boostjunkie09;6489265]Click image for larger version. 

Name:	003.JPG 
Views:	830 
Size:	485.0 KB 
ID:	137041Click image for larger version. 

Name:	004.JPG 
Views:	809 
Size:	452.2 KB 
ID:	137043Click image for larger version. 

Name:	007.JPG 
Views:	519 
Size:	469.4 KB 
ID:	137044

    I think I'm between 14-18%. The electro scale says 14.5

    I'm 6' 1/2" tall and 209lb. Small bone structure.

    So what is your guys opinion base on these pics?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by boostjunkie09 View Post
    <img src="http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=137041"/><img src="http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=137043"/><img src="http://forums.steroid.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=137044"/>

    I think I'm between 14-18%. The electro scale says 14.5

    I'm 6' 1/2" tall and 209lb. Small bone structure.

    Be easy on me I just started cutting two weeks ago.

    Also finishing up my creatine, so I'm holding some water I think.

    I'm all natural so far. And have been training for three years.
    I would place you at 17% based on the pics. You hold fat all over pretty well. Thats good and bad.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    WV, USA
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by gearbox View Post
    I would place you at 17% based on the pics. You hold fat all over pretty well. Thats good and bad.
    So what's the good and the bad?

  23. #23
    Dont count on them for an accurate percentage. But if you use it and always pinch the same area you can keep track of your progression imo. Just my thought.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by barrybulkers View Post
    Dont count on them for an accurate percentage. But if you use it and always pinch the same area you can keep track of your progression imo. Just my thought.
    If the person knows what they are doing it can be accurate.
    And as said above if you measure the same area and same sights and side of body you can rate progress

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    No Sources Given
    Posts
    5,408
    Quote Originally Posted by gearbox View Post
    If the person knows what they are doing it can be accurate.
    And as said above if you measure the same area and same sights and side of body you can rate progress
    This I have a guy who competes in power lifting and has been doing caliper readings for years and he is always right on the mark.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by gearbox View Post
    If the person knows what they are doing it can be accurate.
    And as said above if you measure the same area and same sights and side of body you can rate progress
    I agree. If you do the same person and you know where each measurement, You can conclude close, then as you diet and loos the BF you can see the progress and monitor how your hard work is , or in snot paying off and what you are doing is right for you. ...crazy mike

    I did it and was right on, and saw it go down. !!
    Progress not perfection

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Download FREE 396 Page Steroid Book/Guide!!

396 Pages of Anabolic Steroid resources, techniques and facts. Discover the best types of Steroids to use to reach specific goals and outcomes.