Blast and cruise vs conventional cycling
Previously, I would jump over the blast and cruise forum subjects until the light bulb came on. Now I am scurrying trying to find more info. I have a year and have laid out my proposed cycle, but a comment was made on the blast and cruise. Since I am self imposed TRT (169 total test and doc says TRT too risky), any cycle I do will be blast and cruise to an exrent. I have a competition in about a year so I want to take advantage of the time with being as safe as possible. I read Marcus sticky on short cycling which I will refer to as blast and cruise. Obviously, I will not be able to take my favorite long esther (deca) if I do short cycle. I am 50 and do not have issues with being sterile. I am looking for opinions of short cycling ( 8 weeks max) vs tthe conventional long bulk cycles. I would also appreciate it if you would explain the reasoning. With this new view on blast and cruise, I think that I am on to something. I am looking for something to get a leg up on the young guys. I have been competing for 4 years now. I was dircted down this path and it looks like a great deal of potential that fits my situation.