Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    MinkyGirl's Avatar
    MinkyGirl is offline Female Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    0

    Nutrition facts are nutrition facts, right?

    Okay, so I've read in a lot of places that old fashion oatmeal is better than instant or quick oats. But when I compare the label between old fashion and quick from Quaker, the nutritional information is the same. So what's the diff? I mean, if they have the same calories, the same fat, the same protein, etc.--why would one be better than the other? Even their new Steel Cut oats are only different in process and a 1/2 gram less fat. Is this just some weird media hype to get people to go back to slaving over a stove for 5 minutes instead of 1? (Or in my case, slave over a microwave. )

  2. #2
    Myka's Avatar
    Myka is offline Made Of Sugar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    a small room
    Posts
    8,542
    is it the same sugar?...steel oats are really good...

  3. #3
    MarkyMark's Avatar
    MarkyMark is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Long Beach, Ca
    Posts
    804
    Labels can be quite deceptive ... especially where sugars are concerned...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •