Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. #1
    jg42058p's Avatar
    jg42058p is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    684

    50-60g/protein shake

    Hey,

    I've heard that taking in more than 30g of protien in an hour causes your body to just turn the protein into waste.

    So would this mean that if you drink a protein shake with 50-60g of protein (whey and casien) mixed with water, then 20-30g of that shake would go to waste?

    I imagine this must be dependent upon body size....

    For the record I weigh about 245lbs
    and I have about 180lbs of lean tissue (yes I know I'm fat and I am trying to lose weight)


    Do you think I could drink a 60g protein shake in a half hour and absorb all of it?

  2. #2
    POPS's Avatar
    POPS is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chitown
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by jg42058p View Post
    Hey,

    I've heard that taking in more than 30g of protien in an hour causes your body to just turn the protein into waste.

    So would this mean that if you drink a protein shake with 50-60g of protein (whey and casien) mixed with water, then 20-30g of that shake would go to waste?

    I imagine this must be dependent upon body size....

    For the record I weigh about 245lbs
    and I have about 180lbs of lean tissue (yes I know I'm fat and I am trying to lose weight)


    Do you think I could drink a 60g protein shake in a half hour and absorb all of it?
    well first off I never mix whey and casein together. Ill have a whey shake pwo for quick absorbtion and a casein before bed for slow digestion.

  3. #3
    C_Bino's Avatar
    C_Bino is offline $BAM-7246~AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    ON, Canada
    Posts
    7,169
    Quote Originally Posted by jg42058p View Post
    Hey,

    I've heard that taking in more than 30g of protien in an hour causes your body to just turn the protein into waste.
    You heard wrong.

  4. #4
    Little Herc's Avatar
    Little Herc is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Never Never Land
    Posts
    326
    Quote Originally Posted by C_Bino View Post
    You heard wrong.
    Well their was a study that said taking more than 15g protein per 90min in fluid form didn't raise protein synthesis ANY. Let me find it. I dunno it might have been some bogus study done to promote something else but it looked legit.

  5. #5
    Little Herc's Avatar
    Little Herc is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Never Never Land
    Posts
    326
    please debunk this study for me so i can go back to drinking my whey 50grams at a time http://www.precisionnutrition.com/rr-whey-too-much

  6. #6
    DSM4Life's Avatar
    DSM4Life is offline Snook~ AR Lounge Monitor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Blog Entries
    1
    It's a common myth.

  7. #7
    Klimax's Avatar
    Klimax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nightmares of bad kids
    Posts
    716
    In my opinion you should decide the dose of your shakes depending of your total pro intake. If you take 300g/day 50 g in a shake is good; if you take 180g/day then make a shake of 30g. In any case everybody is different. It's difficult to say how much will be wasted.

  8. #8
    redz's Avatar
    redz is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    14,260
    Well their was a study that said taking more than 15g protein per 90min in fluid form didn't raise protein synthesis ANY. Let me find it. I dunno it might have been some bogus study done to promote something else but it looked legit.
    There is no truth to that........... Think about how little protein you could take in through liquids if that were true. Its utter bs.

  9. #9
    jg42058p's Avatar
    jg42058p is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    684
    My guess would be that regardless of how much protein you ingest, the best way to ingest it would be slowly. (aside from PWO)

    Thus, if I wanted to take a 60g shake in an hour
    It seems like my body would absorb the protein better if I took in 1/4 the shake, every 15 minutes

    as opposed to drinking the whole 60g shake in 5 minutes.

    Does that not make sense?

  10. #10
    Polska's Avatar
    Polska is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,120
    I make protein shakes consisting of different blends of protein; usually whey, egg, and casein. Different rates of digestion optimize absorption

  11. #11
    Twist's Avatar
    Twist is offline "AR's Personal Trainer"
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    california
    Posts
    4,136
    Study appears to make sense to me. Why would it not?

  12. #12
    starboots's Avatar
    starboots is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    It's a common myth.
    Yep.

  13. #13
    Dobie-BOY's Avatar
    Dobie-BOY is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,185
    To many people use the, "everybody is different" clause instead of just admitting that they don't know the answer to the question. Gets kinda annoying. Ya, everyone is different, but there is a general guideline to this kinda stuff. There is an answer and its not, "everybodys different".

  14. #14
    bigrobbo's Avatar
    bigrobbo is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    28
    [QUOTE=jg42058p;4800143]Hey,

    I've heard that taking in more than 30g of protien in an hour causes your body to just turn the protein into waste.





    Iv also heard if you jack off everyday you will go blind!!...... well I still have 20/20 vision.

  15. #15
    Klimax's Avatar
    Klimax is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nightmares of bad kids
    Posts
    716
    Quote Originally Posted by jg42058p View Post
    My guess would be that regardless of how much protein you ingest, the best way to ingest it would be slowly. (aside from PWO)

    Thus, if I wanted to take a 60g shake in an hour
    It seems like my body would absorb the protein better if I took in 1/4 the shake, every 15 minutes

    as opposed to drinking the whole 60g shake in 5 minutes.

    Does that not make sense?
    I think that for your body there's not great difference.

  16. #16
    manhelthy is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13
    Hello,
    I am newbie in this forum and I really enjoying here.
    Thanks to all share your comments about "50-60g/protein shake".

  17. #17
    bass's Avatar
    bass is offline HRT Specialist ~ Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In Southern Commiefornia
    Posts
    9,357
    watch Milos videos, he really explains the three important nutrients that you need and how much to take. its one of the sticky posts in the diet forum.

  18. #18
    Undercover's Avatar
    Undercover is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    333
    Why is it that whenever this subject is brought up we never get a straight answer? All I see is a bunch of 'True's and 'False' and a study. We need someone to either debunk the study or provide us with proof.

    Any takers?

  19. #19
    Undercover's Avatar
    Undercover is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    333
    A Review of Issues of Dietary Protein Intake in Humans

    Considerable debate has taken place over the safety and validity of increased protein intakes for both weight control and muscle synthesis. The advice to consume diets high in protein by some health professionals, media and popular diet books is given despite a lack of scientific data on the safety of increasing protein consumption. The key issues are the rate at which the gastrointestinal tract can absorb amino acids from dietary proteins (1.3 to 10 g/h) and the liver's capacity to deaminate proteins and produce urea for excretion of excess nitrogen. The accepted level of protein requirement of 0.8g ∙ kg-1 ∙ d-1 is based on structural requirements and ignores the use of protein for energy metabolism. High protein diets on the other hand advocate excessive levels of protein intake on the order of 200 to 400 g/d, which can equate to levels of approximately 5 g ∙ kg-1 ∙ d-1, which may exceed the liver?s capacity to convert excess nitrogen to urea. Dangers of excessive protein, defined as when protein constitutes > 35% of total energy intake, include hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, hyperinsulinemia nausea, diarrhea, and even death (the ?rabbit starvation syndrome?). The three different measures of defining protein intake, which should be viewed together are: absolute intake (g/d), intake related to body weight (g ∙ kg-1 ∙ d-1) and intake as a fraction of total energy (percent energy). A suggested maximum protein intake based on bodily needs, weight control evidence, and avoiding protein toxicity would be approximately of 25% of energy requirements at approximately 2 to 2.5 g ∙ kg-1 ∙ d-1, corresponding to 176 g protein per day for an 80 kg individual on a 12,000kJ/d diet. This is well below the theoretical maximum safe intake range for an 80 kg person (285 to 365 g/d).

    Amino acid catabolism must occur in a way that does not elevate blood ammonia (26). Catabolism of amino acids occurs in the liver, which contains the urea cycle (26), however the rate of conversion of amino acid derived ammonia to urea is limited. Rudman et al. (27)

    Early findings suggest that rapidly absorbed proteins such as free amino acids and WP, transiently and moderately inhibit protein breakdown (39, 53), yet stimulate protein synthesis by 68% [using nonoxidative leucine disposal (NOLD) as an index of protein synthesis] (54). Casein protein has been shown to inhibit protein breakdown by 30% for a 7-h postprandial period, and only slightly increase protein synthesis (38, 54). Rapidly absorbed amino acids despite stimulating greater protein synthesis, also stimulate greater amino acid oxidation, and hence results in a lower net protein gain, than slowly absorbed protein (54). Leucine balance, a measurable endpoint for protein balance, is indicated in Figure 1, which shows slowly absorbed amino acids (~ 6 to 7 g/h), such as CAS and 2.3 g of WP repeatedly taken orally every 20 min (RPT-WP), provide significantly better protein balance than rapidly absorbed amino acids (39, 54).

    The misconception in the fitness and sports industries is that rapidly absorbed protein, such as WP and AA promote better protein anabolism. As the graph shows, slowly absorbed protein such as CAS and small amounts of WP (RPT-WP) provide four and nine times more protein synthesis than WP.

    This ?slow? and ?fast? protein concept provides some clearer evidence that although human physiology may allow for rapid and increased absorption rate of amino acids, as in the case of WP (8 to 10 g/h), this fast absorption is not strongly correlated with a ?maximal protein balance,? as incorrectly interpreted by fitness enthusiasts, athletes, and bodybuilders.

    Using the findings of amino acid absorption rates shown in Table 2 (using leucine balance as a measurable endpoint for protein balance), a maximal amino acid intake measured by the inhibition of proteolysis and increase in postprandial protein gain, may only be ~ 6 to 7 g/h (as described by RPT-WP, and casein) (38), which corresponds to a maximal protein intake of 144 to 168 g/d.

    The rate of amino acid absorption from protein is quite slow (~ 5 to 8 g/h, from Table 2) when compared to that of other macronutrients, with fatty acids at ~ 0.175 g ? kg-1 ? h-1 (~ 14 g/h) (55) and glucose 60 to 100 g/h (0.8 to 1.2 g carbohydrate ? kg-1 ? h-1) for an 80 kg individual (56). From our earlier calculations elucidating the maximal amounts of protein intake from MRUS, an 80 kg subject could theoretically tolerate up to 301 to 365 g of protein per day, but this would require an absorption rate of 12.5 to 15 g/h, an unlikely level given the results of the studies reported above.

    The consumption of large amounts of protein by athletes and bodybuilders is not a new practice (13). Recent evidence suggests that increased protein intakes for endurance and strength-trained athletes can increase strength and recovery from exercise (14, 80, 81). In healthy adult men consuming small frequent meals providing protein at 2.5 g ? kg-1 ? d-1, there was a decreased protein breakdown, and increased protein synthesis of up to 63%, compared with intakes of 1g ? kg-1 ? d-1 (16). Subjects receiving 1g ? kg-1 ? d-1 underwent muscle protein breakdown with less evident changes in muscle protein synthesis. Some evidence suggests, however, that a high protein diet increases leucine oxidation (82, 83), while other data demonstrate that the slower digestion rate of protein (38, 54), and the timing of protein ingestion (with resistance training) (84) promote muscle protein synthesis.

    Absorption rates of amino acids from the gut can vary from 1.4 g/h for raw egg white to 8 to 10 g/h for whey protein isolate. Slowly absorbed amino acids such as casein (~ 6 g/h) and repeated small doses of whey protein (2.9 g per 20 min, totaling ~ 7 g/h) promote leucine balance, a marker of protein balance, superior to that of a single dose of 30 g of whey protein or free amino acids which are both rapidly absorbed (8 to 10 g/h), and enhance amino acid oxidation. This gives us an initial understanding that although higher protein intakes are physiologically possible, and tolerable by the human body, they may not be functionally optimal in terms of building and preserving body protein. The general, although incorrect consensus among athletes and bodybuilders, is that rapid protein absorption corresponds to greater muscle building.

    From the limited data available on amino acid absorption rates, and the physiological parameters of urea synthesis, the maximal safe protein intakes for humans have been estimated at ~ 285 g/d for an 80 kg male. It is not the intention of this article, however, to promote the consumption of large amounts of protein, but rather to prompt an investigation into what are the parameters of human amino acid kinetics. In the face of the rising tide of obesity in the Western world where energy consumption overrides energy expenditure, a more prudent and practical approach, which may still provide favorable outcomes, is a 25% protein energy diet, which would provide 118 g protein on an 8000 kJ/d diet at 1.5 g ? kg-1 ? d-1 for an 80 kg individual (Table 2).

    Little data exists on the comprehensive metabolic effects of large amounts of dietary protein in the order of 300 to 400 g/d. Intakes of this magnitude would result in some degree of prolonged hyperaminoacidemia, hyperammonemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperglucagonemia, and some conversion to fat, but the metabolic and physiological consequences of such states are currently unknown. The upper limit of protein intake is widely debated, with many experts advocating levels up to 2.0 g ? kg-1 ? d-1 being quite safe (102, 117, 118) and that renal considerations are not an issue at this level in individuals with normal renal function
    This was a really interesting read. I bolded the important parts and underlined what I thought was crucial.

  20. #20
    Undercover's Avatar
    Undercover is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    333
    bumpety bump

  21. #21
    Undercover's Avatar
    Undercover is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    333
    c-c-c-c-combo bump

  22. #22
    stevey_6t9's Avatar
    stevey_6t9 is offline RIP Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian - Veni Vidi Vici
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Mt. Olympus
    Posts
    3,991
    common myth 30 g absorption. It varys depending the time of the day. eg breakfast and PWO your body would assimulate more. Your body only absrobs as much as it needs. try telling ronnie coleman he can only eat 30g of protein in one sitting hah

  23. #23
    jamyjamjr is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    R.I.P. T-MOS
    Posts
    4,944
    Quote Originally Posted by C_Bino View Post
    You heard wrong.
    x10...

  24. #24
    vingtor's Avatar
    vingtor is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    hell.
    Posts
    165
    yeah man. you know its not good if you get gas. but dude, it takes like 2-3 hours for protien to dissolve(depends on kind of course) and go into bloodstream. just eat 2.8 grams of protien per kilo pound your fine.

  25. #25
    Twist's Avatar
    Twist is offline "AR's Personal Trainer"
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    california
    Posts
    4,136
    In solid food I think it depends on your body weight. if you are 200lbs 9%bf then of course your body will assimilate more protein than a newb at 145lbs 13%bf.

    I think liquid is a different story. it goes through your body too quickly.

  26. #26
    vingtor's Avatar
    vingtor is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    hell.
    Posts
    165
    your gastric emptying time with a fluid is shorter than somthing then food. its like this

    after workout, GO FOR IT!

    but if it comes down to shake or not eating, SHAKE. having food, and mixed diet, is usally better than somthing liquid.

  27. #27
    lee543 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1
    Your strength is great.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •