
Originally Posted by
ascendant
it seems like every month, all different foods keep changing as to where they're at on the GI index. i remember not too long ago, pasta used to supposedly be bad. not they say that its GI is actually pretty low, particularly with "al dente" pasta, and that the only concern is when you cook it too long. well, at least that's what most websites say now, but go to one website and it's one thing and another website will say something completely different with a different GI for it as well.
i used to love having my cinnamon raisin bagels in the morning with a little low-fat cream cheese. now because it's supposedly a high GI food, i typically have oatmeal, which i really can't stand. i don't care how you flavor it up, it still tastes like crap.
now a lot of people are saying the GI isn't as much of a concern as some people are making it out to be, saying there are way too many other factors to take into consideration. also considering we all know enough to eat our carbs with protein and possibly fat as well, that also helps to lower the GI.
i'm really tempted now to just go back to my bagels in the am where i can actually enjoy my breakfast. no, whole wheat ones aren't an option for me. it's all about the cinnamon raisin and they regretfully don't make them with whole wheat, at least nobody does yet as far as i've seen. but i'm curious as to what you guys think about the whole GI thing according to your research? is it really just overhyped? should we really sacrifice what we like to eat for what the GI tells us is better? will it really make much of an impact on my results? your thoughts would be appreciated.