Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    MR-FQ320's Avatar
    MR-FQ320 is offline This means war!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gods own country
    Posts
    3,007

    Nutritional info brown rice Vs Spaghetti

    Im using myfitnesspal.com and I think there may be a discrepancy with a brown rice entry as follows:

    Asda - Easy Cook Brown Rice, 100 g served 351 69 4 9 cals/carbs/fat/pro

    Asda - Pulse Spaghetti, 77 g raw 100 17 1 5 cals/carbs/fat/pro

    Now 100g of cooked rice is not a lot and certainly not a stomach filler, but that seems a shit load of cals, i know its dense but cmon, anybody have different macros for this?

  2. #2
    --->>405<<---'s Avatar
    --->>405<<--- is offline Elite-AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,836
    1 cup (172g) of the brn rice i use has about 130g carbs.. it is very carb dense compared to other things like oats and pasta i have noticed. thats the one down side ive seen to brn rice for me and others who like to eat a lot!

  3. #3
    Riptorn's Avatar
    Riptorn is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    161
    If your using myfitnesspal on a smartphone you can scan the foods barcode and that'll do the calculations for you. I use this app and can help if needed.

  4. #4
    MR-FQ320's Avatar
    MR-FQ320 is offline This means war!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gods own country
    Posts
    3,007
    Quote Originally Posted by --->>405<<--- View Post
    1 cup (172g) of the brn rice i use has about 130g carbs.. it is very carb dense compared to other things like oats and pasta i have noticed. thats the one down side ive seen to brn rice for me and others who like to eat a lot!
    I am now pondering Brown rice = awesome for bulking, not so good for cutting ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Riptorn View Post
    If your using myfitnesspal on a smartphone you can scan the foods barcode and that'll do the calculations for you. I use this app and can help if needed.
    ^^ yeah thanks man, im sure I scanned it before and thats what its stored as but now im taking more notice of what it says, im concerned im consuming so many cals very easily and I am questioning the databases values.

  5. #5
    Riptorn's Avatar
    Riptorn is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    161
    While I can't speak to your caloric intake, you can override the stored values and insert your own. I found WalMart 2% milk was off too and had to manually change it.

    I think brown rice is as good a carb as any as long as you stick to your cutting macros. I saw someone post 60/20/20 Protein/Carbs/Fat but don't quote me on it.
    Last edited by Riptorn; 09-26-2012 at 01:43 PM.

  6. #6
    MR-FQ320's Avatar
    MR-FQ320 is offline This means war!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gods own country
    Posts
    3,007
    Im cycling my carbs. zero, medium and high, very complicated, thats why i use a diary, and probably all gone to whack with skewed values grr

    thanks anyway bro

  7. #7
    MR-FQ320's Avatar
    MR-FQ320 is offline This means war!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gods own country
    Posts
    3,007
    think i have found the right one, this seems more realistic Asda - Easy Cook Long Grain Brown Rice- Cooked 200g, 200 g 231 42 2 6 cals/carbs/fat/pro

  8. #8
    --->>405<<---'s Avatar
    --->>405<<--- is offline Elite-AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,836
    Quote Originally Posted by MR-FQ320 View Post
    think i have found the right one, this seems more realistic Asda - Easy Cook Long Grain Brown Rice- Cooked 200g, 200 g 231 42 2 6 cals/carbs/fat/pro
    u really should measure ur rice dry.. not cooked

  9. #9
    MR-FQ320's Avatar
    MR-FQ320 is offline This means war!
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Gods own country
    Posts
    3,007
    I thought it would me more accurate to measure it cooked, besides I bulk cook it now anyway.

  10. #10
    Noles12's Avatar
    Noles12 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,336
    Quote Originally Posted by MR-FQ320 View Post
    I thought it would me more accurate to measure it cooked, besides I bulk cook it now anyway.
    Dry is more accurate as you can not be sure of how much water is actually absorbed accounting for the added mass

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •