Results 1 to 16 of 16
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Gallowmere

Thread: Calories in Chicken?

  1. #1
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683

    Calories in Chicken?

    I always assumed that chicken was almost fat free meat, but when I Google it, the nutrition websites say that a 150g chicken fillet has 18 grams of fat and over 300 calories.

    Is this about right or is it way off?

  2. #2
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_20200822_205937_com.android.chrome.jpg 
Views:	461 
Size:	449.2 KB 
ID:	179777

  3. #3
    slfmade's Avatar
    slfmade is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    N. Hollywood on Radford
    Posts
    3,940
    You need to be more specific on your google search. Look for "plain boneless skinless chicken breast nutrition". If it's "made with rib meat" there will be more fat than if not. - Still, not 18 grams of it. I'm assuming this was fried chicken.

  4. #4
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by slfmade View Post
    You need to be more specific on your google search. Look for "plain boneless skinless chicken breast nutrition". If it's "made with rib meat" there will be more fat than if not. - Still, not 18 grams of it. I'm assuming this was fried chicken.
    Must be, I can't se 18 grams in a lean raw fillet

  5. #5
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Just re-googled the skinless lean version and a 150g fillet yields around 150 cals with 30g of protein.

    So crisis averted ��

  6. #6
    slfmade's Avatar
    slfmade is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    N. Hollywood on Radford
    Posts
    3,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Small View Post
    Must be, I can't se 18 grams in a lean raw fillet
    Nope. It should be zero. Even with rib meat less than 3g.

  7. #7
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by slfmade View Post
    Nope. It should be zero. Even with rib meat less than 3g.
    That's what I was thinking, but I was panicking when I saw the website.

    Thanks for the help.

  8. #8
    Gallowmere's Avatar
    Gallowmere is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,368

    Calories in Chicken?

    That looks more like a thigh than anything.
    “Filet” is pretty damned vague.

    ETA: it’s also entirely possible that it’s based on a whole chicken, which would actually be pretty close to accurate, though there’s obviously notable variance between animals.
    Mr. Small likes this.

  9. #9
    SingNirvana is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20
    Same here I thought chicken has less fat, got nervous when im reading the comments. And thanks guys for clarifying. I guess I will still have skinless breast.

  10. #10
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by SingNirvana View Post
    Same here I thought chicken has less fat, got nervous when im reading the comments. And thanks guys for clarifying. I guess I will still have skinless breast.
    Good choice, should have no fat whatsoever

  11. #11
    AwareXx is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    109
    Chicken comes in many cuts, including breasts, thighs, wings and drumsticks. Each cut contains a different number of calories and a different proportion of protein to fat. The calorie in the chicken is lower when it is skinless.

  12. #12
    Mr. Small's Avatar
    Mr. Small is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    683
    Quote Originally Posted by AwareXx View Post
    Chicken comes in many cuts, including breasts, thighs, wings and drumsticks. Each cut contains a different number of calories and a different proportion of protein to fat. The calorie in the chicken is lower when it is skinless.
    I have lean chicken breast every time, so there's no added fat.

  13. #13
    charger69's Avatar
    charger69 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    8,155
    Quote Originally Posted by AwareXx View Post
    Chicken comes in many cuts, including breasts, thighs, wings and drumsticks. Each cut contains a different number of calories and a different proportion of protein to fat. The calorie in the chicken is lower when it is skinless.
    Unless you are competing, the difference is minimal and will not really matter.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #14
    Gallowmere's Avatar
    Gallowmere is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,368

    Calories in Chicken?

    Quote Originally Posted by charger69 View Post
    Unless you are competing, the difference is minimal and will not really matter.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I wouldn’t call it minimal, no matter what the circumstance. Even skinless, you’re talking a difference of 95:5 (breast), 70:30 (thigh), and 60:40 (wing).
    That’s like saying there’s minimal difference between 96:4 ground beef and 73:27, when the difference is roughly 30-35% higher kcals in the latter, due to increased energy density from the lipids.
    In any world, 30-35% is pretty damned notable, especially when you consider the protein intakes of your average resistance training population member.

  15. #15
    charger69's Avatar
    charger69 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    8,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Gallowmere View Post
    I wouldn’t call it minimal, no matter what the circumstance. Even skinless, you’re talking a difference of 95:5 (breast), 70:30 (thigh), and 60:40 (wing).
    That’s like saying there’s minimal difference between 96:4 ground beef and 73:27, when the difference is roughly 30-35% higher kcals in the latter, due to increased energy density from the lipids.
    In any world, 30-35% is pretty damned notable, especially when you consider the protein intakes of your average resistance training population member.


    Agreed it is different however not everyone will eat the same meal everyday like us. LOL
    I am assuming that the individual is eating once or twice a week and is not tracking macros ( IOW- it fluctuates quite a bit). One chicken leg meat is like 160 calories.
    Once you start getting into the single digit body fat, that is where this can make a difference however I will substitute dark meat for chicken breast even in single digits and you will not see an increase in fat or weight.
    You would be surprised that altering your macros on paper will make you get fat, but in real life it doesn’t mean anything and your weight and fat stay the same. You do this repeatedly and yes you will see a difference build up.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. #16
    davg is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    13
    The caloric value depends on whether there is skin, how it is cooked, what it is seasoned with, and whether there are additives. I love chicken and dishes with it, but sometimes I don't know how to calculate everything correctly myself.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •