Printable View
Bad news lads,
Tested my Sky Pharma Test-E today using roidtest and it came back as negative. It came in this sketchy container too which should've been my first indication. The container makes me think this isn't even Sky Pharma and my "source" just duped me, but wanted to share just in case.
Attachment 177368
Here's the test: Vial B shows that there's carrier oils present, but Vial D should be a purple with Testosterone present.
Attachment 177369
It looks like a kid made the label .
Why do people keep insisting getting stuff from places that no one has ever heard.
Do your research .
Sent from my JSN-AL00 using Tapatalk
Im new to this game but even i can see that looks extremely suspect lol.
That and the fact that it looks like someone jerked off in dirty water. Don’t inject shit in your body if you don’t know what it is.
Looks like whoever brewed that had solvents still on their hands when they applied the label. You can see the ridges and whorls of their fingerprints.
Not a big fan of Roid-Test, but totally understand why you want to screen the stuff you put in your body.
Roid test is a joke and completely inaccurate. Just Google colormetric testing to find out how much of a joke it is.
Labels dont matter at all I can guarantee you one of the best sources in the game right now has very shitty labels. He is only on a couple private boards, so dont judge by lablels. A few sources that have been around a long time use lables that they print themselves and it shows but the product is good.
Yeah I hear you guys, it wasn't like that on the site when I bought it. Is there any other ways you guys test your stuff? Lab work can be pretty expensive...
A total and free test is like 43 dollars, how much did that roidtest cost you?Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlod
Didn't mean to be such a prick.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitmare67
Make sure to do research and talk with knowledgeable people in this area and they would help you make a better decision.
Be weary of that lab bro.
Sent from my JSN-AL00 using Tapatalk
Buy from a reputable lab and then you don't need to run a test. If you have to test the lab that already tells your answer before even seeing the result.Quote:
Originally Posted by scarlod
This is not a source board, fishing going to get you in trouble and get you scammed / ripped off.
Do a lot more research before making a purchase again.
Amen to thatQuote:
Originally Posted by jstone
For lab test doesn't he have to put a unknown substance in his body for a period of time to get the results? During that time I am sure if the stuff is no good things could go very wrong. Is there a way to test substances before we put them into our bodies? I can see the test not being super accurate but a least it is something. If he did have a samople of good stuff he could confirm his results. I would like to know what would happen with the good stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by HoldMyBeer
The cops use colormetrics here. If you get caught with with a narcotic they check it using colormetrics. I can see how the potency value may not be accurate but the positive negative value must be accurate. They charge people based of these tests. Is it colormatics in general that is not accurate or is it the brand roid tester that is no good?
Around my way, The field tests that use ampules of liquid that turns certain colors in the presence of certain substances are good enough to make arrests, but not to get convictions. They need a quality and quantity test from the lab to present in court After arraignment.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder why they need a quality test. Quantity is Obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by C27H40O3
The qualitative test just tells you what the compound actually is, and the quantitative testing tells you how many mags per ml. As far as I know qualitative test would be the only one needed for a conviction. Once they know the product is actually illegal then charges would be brought forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by Noname81
If you look into the testing LE uses for field tests they're wildly inaccurate. Lots of mundane things can cause false positives, hence the need for real testing for trials.