You're right, it's very nitpicky.
1. I didn't write these articles so I'm not going to edit them.
2. The person who wrote that (Kingofmasters) is from Holland, and English isn't his first language.
If you say so. I've seen many different estimates on this (from very high, to very low), including the data they showed to back up their claim. Ultimately I don't think it really matters what the actual number is, because regardless the stuff works, but believe whatever you want.
im simply trying to point out that peoples opinions arent necessarily stated in fact. this is put on an open message board for everyone to read, and people will, inevitably take it as fact. if you read the literature it doesnt have anything to do with belief. plus i didnt say it didnt work, i simply stated that he was wrong.
This is his opinion and he'll have to tell you why he thinks that. I suggest you try PM'ing him.
OK, again if you say so. I've read many different opinions as to why some consider DNP so dangerous, and they've all had their reasons.
whenever you look at pharmaceutical research this is what they use to determine how safe a drug is: ed50/ ld50 is the therapeutic index. its not my opinion.
Say what you like, different people react differently. Some people lose muscle very fast with small amounts of T3, others run 200+mcg ED and lose no muscle at all. Don't take my word for it, just search this and other boards for peoples experiences.
im not interested in peoples opinions. if you look at the research with t3, you get an increase in nitrogen in the urine, hence your burning lbm.
Yes, again it's very nitpicky.
This is the formula that was used to do that calculation.
C(t)=Co*EXP(-Kt)
ct is concentration at time t
Cp os omotoa; cpmcemtratopm
Co is initial concentration
k is time constant
t is time
k=0.019254 for DNP
Example... C(t)=200*exp(-0.019254*36)=100.0003181
Example... C(t)=200*exp(-0.019254*24)=125.9923721
If you don't agree with it you can confirm the results
here.
this is a measure of half life, not steady state, it doesnt take into account how the body rids itself of the drug, hence it is useless.
Well you're pretty much coming off that way IMO. It seems that most of your beef is with what KOM wrote (or how he wrote it), so why don't you PM him instead of cluttering this thread.
