Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Ufa's Avatar
    Ufa
    Ufa is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hotel California
    Posts
    2,861

    Testosterone injected Sub-q?

    ...........
    Last edited by Ufa; 03-23-2007 at 08:32 AM.

  2. #2
    zipster_dude's Avatar
    zipster_dude is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Land of the Free(kind of)
    Posts
    489
    I would say someone posted the wrong thing. Maybe they misunderstood the injection instructions. I don't think any doc would be such a dumb ass.

    At least not one I would see.

  3. #3
    StevePJC's Avatar
    StevePJC is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    599
    Owwww!

    All I can say is OWWW!!!

    DAMN!! If he's serious and does it.... The man has balls. Big ones.

  4. #4
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Ufa
    I swear to god I read on annother forum
    that some author of Test Syndrome Dr.
    Shippen has advised patients to do
    Sup-q test injections.

    Is this quy a first class quack or what?
    Ufa, they worship dr shippen over there. You could get banned for questioning his genius. Still, despite my medical ignorance, it seems that sub q injection of an oil based testosterone is a bad idea. Would the same be true for test prop?

    Is prop oil based? How about sub-q for a non oil based test, if that exists?
    Last edited by comradebillyboy; 01-17-2007 at 03:42 PM.

  5. #5
    Knight1811 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
    Ufa, they worship dr shippen over there. You could get banned for questioning his genius. Still, despite my medical ignorance, it seems that sub q injection of an oil based testosterone is a bad idea. Would the same be true for test prop?

    Is prop oil based? How about sub-q for a non oil based test, if that exists?
    Just fyi:

    Prop is an oil. Test suspension is not oil base. Oh, 100mg of Test prop is not equal to 100mg of test suspension. The esters take up 28mgs or so, whereas, test suspension doesn't have an ester so it is 100mgs of test if it is dosed at 100mgs.

    Knight1811

  6. #6
    plzr8's Avatar
    plzr8 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,352
    yes sub-q of any oil based is an abcess and major problem waiting to happen....

    curious about susp and winstrol , would like to hear the reasons why it they are bad also?

  7. #7
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Knight1811
    Just fyi:

    Prop is an oil. Test suspension is not oil base. Oh, 100mg of Test prop is not equal to 100mg of test suspension. The esters take up 28mgs or so, whereas, test suspension doesn't have an ester so it is 100mgs of test if it is dosed at 100mgs.

    Knight1811
    thanks for the clarification.

    So would a daily sub-q of test suspension be a reasonable protocol?

  8. #8
    fbcoach is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    131
    Just to clarify on how the injection is to be done: The needle is to penetrate the skin just as in an IM injection. The difference is the needle only goes in as far as where the skin/fat meets the muscle..not that I would take this chance.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •