...........
...........
Last edited by Ufa; 03-23-2007 at 08:32 AM.
I would say someone posted the wrong thing. Maybe they misunderstood the injection instructions. I don't think any doc would be such a dumb ass.
At least not one I would see.
Owwww!
All I can say is OWWW!!!
DAMN!! If he's serious and does it.... The man has balls. Big ones.
Ufa, they worship dr shippen over there. You could get banned for questioning his genius. Still, despite my medical ignorance, it seems that sub q injection of an oil based testosterone is a bad idea. Would the same be true for test prop?Originally Posted by Ufa
Is prop oil based? How about sub-q for a non oil based test, if that exists?
Last edited by comradebillyboy; 01-17-2007 at 02:42 PM.
Just fyi:Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
Prop is an oil. Test suspension is not oil base. Oh, 100mg of Test prop is not equal to 100mg of test suspension. The esters take up 28mgs or so, whereas, test suspension doesn't have an ester so it is 100mgs of test if it is dosed at 100mgs.
Knight1811
yes sub-q of any oil based is an abcess and major problem waiting to happen....
curious about susp and winstrol, would like to hear the reasons why it they are bad also?
thanks for the clarification.Originally Posted by Knight1811
So would a daily sub-q of test suspension be a reasonable protocol?
Just to clarify on how the injection is to be done: The needle is to penetrate the skin just as in an IM injection. The difference is the needle only goes in as far as where the skin/fat meets the muscle..not that I would take this chance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)