Thread: MRI for low test??
-
10-23-2007, 11:34 AM #1Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
MRI for low test??
My doc wants to give me an mri, after my test results came back low at 260... Does anybody know why he wants to give me an mri?
-
10-23-2007, 11:35 AM #2Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
I was thinking that maybe he wants to see if I have a tumor that is efecting piturity glands...
-
10-23-2007, 12:20 PM #3Originally Posted by tvd220
Were your other levels in check? I was in a similar situation a couple of years ago: my test was low, my LH and FSH were low, my SHBG was low, and my prolactin was high. The result of the CT scan was inconclusive - if there is a growth on my pituitary it is a "prolactinoma" and it is smaller than 3mm. There is no concern right now. I take trib to keep my natty levels up when I am not "on". I did not get an MRI.
Good luck!
-
10-23-2007, 05:31 PM #4Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
My total test was at 260, and free was at 48.6ish, and Im only 25!!
Everything else was normal. Actually, my 260 was "in range" but in no way is that normal for a 25 year old.
-
10-23-2007, 05:45 PM #5Originally Posted by tvd220
Can I ask: what prompted you to get checked out? Did you have symptoms of low test or was it caught while testing for other things?
-
10-23-2007, 10:58 PM #6
[QUOTE=BigJames]That is the reason. He will MRI or CT Scan your pituitary and see if there is a micronoma interfering with your pituitary. Keep this in mind - a very high percentage of males in the world have small growths on their pituitary and 95% of them go undetected because they have no affect on their physiology. Also, in almost all cases these are benign (non-cancero
I'm glad I came across this, my test levels was in the 20's and she never even mentioned doing an mri regarding your above post. I'm gonna check up on this a little more.
-
10-24-2007, 01:01 AM #7Originally Posted by BigJames
Why not just use AAS other than testosterone , such as trenbolone , which will not show up unless spicifically tested for? it would suppress and keep your testosterone levels low, while your doc and insurance provided the test e or sustanon for a great stack!
-
10-24-2007, 10:21 AM #8Originally Posted by TexSavant
Thanks for the idea!
-
10-24-2007, 10:51 AM #9Originally Posted by TexSavant
-
10-24-2007, 11:43 AM #10Originally Posted by ***xxx***
-
10-24-2007, 02:19 PM #11Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
Originally Posted by BigJames
I felt like i never recovered from a cycle, and i went to endo and had it checked, and then kept getting it checked over a course of a year, and realized it was not improving. I was able to get it up to 430, but that was while i was on nolva and exem
Thinking about just staying on nolva untill i decide to go on hrt, or do what you are doing.
-
10-24-2007, 02:20 PM #12Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
Originally Posted by ***xxx***
I was thinking about that..
but I think in the long run, going through life with a condition not treated is worse than having high insurance rates.
-
10-24-2007, 02:21 PM #13Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 874
[QUOTE=chuck_redhill]
Originally Posted by BigJames
-
10-24-2007, 03:22 PM #14Originally Posted by tvd220
I would expect nolva to boost your natty levels...I like trib because it seems to work for me (I know some say it does nothing) and it does not negatively affect IGF-1 levels like nolva does. Nolva also boosts your overall estrogen levels because it prevents estrogen from being absorbed at the breast tissue so it can result in some other hormone related issued if you are not on Test.
Anyway, good luck man. I hope you can find something that works for you ASAP!
Take care,
BigJ
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS