Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Optimal Ranges

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Fla
    Posts
    4,713

    Optimal Ranges

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Slide1.JPG 
Views:	433 
Size:	57.4 KB 
ID:	118432

    There are a lot of Physicians who practice restorative (TRT/AA) medicine and have their own blood reference ranges for what they believe to be "optimal" for excellent health. Dr. Duzgan, a world renowned medical restorative practitioner wrote an excellent book recently called "Your Blood Doesn't Lie" which I highly recommend as it's a great read and where you can learn.

    Dr. Dzugan published what he believes to be some of the most important optimal blood ranges when compared to the standard ranges we find on labs today.

    In the attachment Duzgan compares some of the key panels important to us side by side for you.

    You may want to save this for future reference.

  2. #2
    ConArmas is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chico, CA
    Posts
    113
    Thanks for the reference. The cholesterol looks a little higher than I usually see and the estrogen (men), a little lower...

  3. #3
    bass's Avatar
    bass is offline HRT Specialist ~ Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In Southern Commiefornia
    Posts
    9,332
    thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Fla
    Posts
    4,713
    Quote Originally Posted by bass View Post
    thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?
    Who knows bass; guess they want to measure E2 in dead men LOL!

  5. #5
    ecdysone is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    498
    Nice reference table for everything except (IMO) test/E2

    E2 should never be 0, and it might have been a little better to bump the optimal range up to 30 or so.

    Guys often forget that with E2 less is not always better. Some is needed for bone repla***ent.

    Total T at 827 is a little funny, number-wise. Maybe 900?

    What about el supremo: Free Test??

    Would be great to have a "Master Table" of reference values to post as a sticky (of course realizing that each lab's reference range may be method-specific)

  6. #6
    zaggahamma's Avatar
    zaggahamma is offline Mr. Moderation
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    Quote Originally Posted by bass View Post
    thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?
    having that 0 in there just shows how invalid and meaningless yet another graph/range is

  7. #7
    SEOINAGE's Avatar
    SEOINAGE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,863
    my guess would be that their optimal ranges would be different if they could even display a number higher than the reference range, not implying more is better, but pretty sure that is how they come up with the top number.

  8. #8
    Brohim's Avatar
    Brohim is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,297
    Seems chaps feel better at 600-800 than top of the range 1100. Guess the body is more balanced at the mid upper level. Just a guess though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •