Results 1 to 20 of 20
Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By dreadnok89
  • 1 Post By Moparman

Thread: does weight effect how much you should do in a shot?

  1. #1
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978

    does weight effect how much you should do in a shot?

    Just wondering, I'm thinking of switching to shots
    powerlifterty16 likes this.

  2. #2
    HRTstudent's Avatar
    HRTstudent is offline HRT Specialist ~ Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,999
    Blog Entries
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by dreadnok89 View Post
    Just wondering, I'm thinking of switching to shots
    no

    while it may be a factor, it is insignificant. what will definitely matter more is the percentage of bodyfat, however. more bodyfat is associated with more aromatase activity.

    this is all about population averages though; what matters to you is how you react.

  3. #3
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    OK thx hrt. I'm about 260 but the only fatty areas really are my pubic area and some stomach. I guess normally areas?

  4. #4
    LowT Mike is offline HRT Specialist, P.A. - LowTestosterone.com
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,305
    Yes...A few things here. Weight does play a part. But like HRT student said its more about your percentage of fat vs your actual weight. You will have more conversion of T to E the higher your boday fat is. The aromatase enzyme lives in adipose tissue so a heavy man will have more conversion and need to pay close attention to E2 levels. Ive treated men as high as 425 pounds. I couldnt get them on T right off the bat because even with an Anti E, Dim, Zinc, ect majority of there T would just convert. So a nice HCG diet. Shed 60-70 pounds get them below 350 then you can treat.

    Another good starting formula that is weight dependant to start someone on T would be .9mg (of T)/kg body weight. Start low go slow when titrating dose.

  5. #5
    HRTstudent's Avatar
    HRTstudent is offline HRT Specialist ~ Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,999
    Blog Entries
    27
    "start low, go slow"

    lol I like it!


    LowT Mike, on that formula (.9mg (of T)/kg), how many guys need that amount give-or-take 10%? I ask because it seems like some of the leaders in the TRT field are getting better results with T amounts under 100mg per week, sometimes even in the 60mg range.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    i must be pretty dim, because my weight in kilograms is 91, so i did .9/91 and my result is in a decimal?

  7. #7
    Java Man's Avatar
    Java Man is offline Known Troll
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Matrix
    Posts
    4,327
    Quote Originally Posted by powerlifterty16 View Post
    i must be pretty dim, because my weight in kilograms is 91, so i did .9/91 and my result is in a decimal?
    multiply, don't divide. 0.9 x 91 = 81.9mg.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Java Man View Post
    multiply, don't divide. 0.9 x 91 = 81.9mg.
    that makes more sense but whyd he put the divide symbol lol?

  9. #9
    Trific's Avatar
    Trific is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by powerlifterty16 View Post
    that makes more sense but whyd he put the divide symbol lol?
    To see if you could figure it out

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Trific View Post
    To see if you could figure it out
    what?

  11. #11
    phaedo's Avatar
    phaedo is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by powerlifterty16 View Post
    that makes more sense but whyd he put the divide symbol lol?
    ... lol.

    LowT Mike stated it correctly. He said 0.9mg (of T)/kg -- or verbally said as 0.9 milligrams of testosterone per kilogram of body-weight. Therefore, 0.9mg/kg * 91kg/1 = 81.9 mg.

    It's hard to explain without a whiteboard, but your confusion stems from the units or "kilograms," specifically. The mathematical condition to express units and then to properly carrying them through the equation (even in this case with a simple a multiplication or division problem) is why LowT Mike expressed "/kg" (or "per kilograms").

    Usually, you unknowingly reduce to the common denominator of units automatically. But the above equation shows your 91 kg is divided by one, illustrating the division of units (not numbers). It's like saying "1" or "1.0." Both the same number, just a different way to express it.
    Last edited by phaedo; 07-10-2013 at 05:42 AM.

  12. #12
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    OK I just did the math. 260 would equate to 105 mg of test a week. And I was reading the subq thread, it really is a no brainer to start shots
    Last edited by dreadnok89; 07-10-2013 at 05:55 AM.

  13. #13
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,119
    Quote Originally Posted by phaedo View Post
    ... lol.

    LowT Mike stated it correctly. He said 0.9mg (of T)/kg -- or verbally said as 0.9 milligrams of testosterone per kilogram of body-weight. Therefore, 0.9mg/kg * 91kg/1 = 81.9 mg.

    It's hard to explain without a whiteboard, but your confusion stems from the units or "kilograms," specifically. The mathematical condition to express units and then to properly carrying them through the equation (even in this case with a simple a multiplication or division problem) is why LowT Mike expressed "/kg" (or "per kilograms").

    Usually, you unknowingly reduce to the common denominator of units automatically. But the above equation shows your 91 kg is divided by one, illustrating the division of units (not numbers). It's like saying "1" or "1.0." Both the same number, just a different way to express it.

    Spoken like a math teacher......
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    Quote Originally Posted by phaedo View Post
    ... lol.

    LowT Mike stated it correctly. He said 0.9mg (of T)/kg -- or verbally said as 0.9 milligrams of testosterone per kilogram of body-weight. Therefore, 0.9mg/kg * 91kg/1 = 81.9 mg.

    It's hard to explain without a whiteboard, but your confusion stems from the units or "kilograms," specifically. The mathematical condition to express units and then to properly carrying them through the equation (even in this case with a simple a multiplication or division problem) is why LowT Mike expressed "/kg" (or "per kilograms").

    Usually, you unknowingly reduce to the common denominator of units automatically. But the above equation shows your 91 kg is divided by one, illustrating the division of units (not numbers). It's like saying "1" or "1.0." Both the same number, just a different way to express it.
    idk..ive always been taught that ''/'' means divide...even when spoken in terms of ''per''
    either way i multiplied and got 80 something mgs. These numbers are for once a week right? I see many on here using 100-250mgs for their trt, and i as a 202 pound guy am supposed to be good with 81? That would be nice if true....i doubt im the smallest on this board in terms of weight lol.

  15. #15
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    I wonder what ones numbers are at 250 a week

  16. #16
    ZenFitness is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    487
    Just back it out:

    .9 * X = 250mg

    250/.9 = 277.77 kgs = 612.4 lbs.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    2,007
    i still would be weary to start at less than 100 tbh lol.

  18. #18
    Black's Avatar
    Black is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,473
    I think that formula would be a good place to start for someone new to TRT injections. Some people jump in head first and start too high (200+) IMO.

    My clinic wanted me to start at 300mg which is ridiculous, so I dropped to 200mg. After doing more research and aromatizing more test, I started dropping my dose every 6 weeks and monitored how I feel. I've gone as low as 100mg a week and found out that 140mg is my spot.

  19. #19
    LowT Mike is offline HRT Specialist, P.A. - LowTestosterone.com
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,305
    Quote Originally Posted by HRTstudent View Post
    "start low, go slow"

    lol I like it!


    LowT Mike, on that formula (.9mg (of T)/kg), how many guys need that amount give-or-take 10%? I ask because it seems like some of the leaders in the TRT field are getting better results with T amounts under 100mg per week, sometimes even in the 60mg range.

    This would be a formula for just a starting dose. When labs come back in 5-6 weeks the good doctor would then titrate accordingly. Sometimes down and sometimes up. Depends mostly on symptoms too. I train all my docs to treat the patient not the labs. Use the labs a basic guidelines but listen to your patient and there symptoms. Some are symptom free with a total T of 600 and free t of 20. Great your work here is done as the Practitioner. Other guys still present heavy symptoms and need to be pushed into the 900,1000,1200 range. I would say generally a mans sweet spot if I had a gun to my head and had to give you awswer would be 800s free of 20+

  20. #20
    Moparman's Avatar
    Moparman is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by powerlifterty16 View Post
    idk..ive always been taught that ''/'' means divide...even when spoken in terms of ''per''
    either way i multiplied and got 80 something mgs. These numbers are for once a week right? I see many on here using 100-250mgs for their trt, and i as a 202 pound guy am supposed to be good with 81? That would be nice if true....i doubt im the smallest on this board in terms of weight lol.
    Think of it like this. If you went 60m/h (60 miles per hour) for 5 hours, did you go 300 miles or only 12???
    phaedo likes this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •