![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
phaedo
If I may caution you, from what is apparently a cocksure remark, is that merely regurgitating anecdotal facts does not constitute "knowledge," nor does a pronouncement of your own greater intelligence make you any wiser. Assuming a haughty position of certainty is only illusory superiority. I'm not saying you're a big dummy, powerlifterty16, but what I am trying to say is that "the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others" [this is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect].
For the most part, doctor's are good people, and pretty smart too! I'm not saying they're the brightest, or even the best, but don't discount a doctor -- or anyone, for that matter -- simply because they do not know. A physician unfamiliar with the appropriate understanding and correct treatment of testosterone-replacement-therapy is not intently violating the Hippocratic Oath, for I'm sure most medical professionals truly believe in "keeping [patients] from harm and injustice." But as I'm sure everyone here can agree, there is nothing more frightening than ignorance in action.
As kelkel and others have alluded too above, it is better to engage in intelligent discourse with your physician, presenting the facts in context and holding your doctor accountable to the empirical evidence available. A good physician-patient relationship is the mutual detection, diagnosis, and treatment of your ailment(s). Of course, if your physician refuses to part from their trenchant falsities, than you as the patient have the right to move on. It's their loss, not yours.
The words of 20th century philosopher Bertrand Russell bears repeating sometimes: "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts."