Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 51 of 51
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: TRT any gains expected?

  1. #41
    Beethoven's Avatar
    Beethoven is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    South Fla
    Posts
    1,472
    Quote Originally Posted by MK1 View Post
    Ok
    So I have been working out my way
    What do you guys recommend for a 4-5 day workout. I have been following a loose schedule of M-legs T-bi's/shoulders W-cardio class T-tris/back F-chest.
    What exercises should I do with what reps
    Hit the training section. They will help you with that. There is a lot of knowledge there.

  2. #42
    Chicagotarsier is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Asia but not Asian.
    Posts
    1,702
    KelKel, After talking to the guys here that are on TrT in Beijing 200 is definately a self administrated dose unless the physician just "does not care".

    I take 175 mg Test P a week TrT and just got my labs back. Let me tell you it was a complete shock. Exactly 52.500 nmol/L (4.5-28 range) was total test. I am about to write a post about the BS of 200 a week TrT and the dangers from my real blood work.

    Your post is excellent.

    Quote Originally Posted by kelkel View Post
    Hi MK!.

    Well, if your T levels were low warranting TRT and you now optimize them then yes, you will see gains. Your levels will be back to those of a young man again and if you train hard, nail down your nutrition and otherwise do things correctly you will definitely see progress. Nutrition is key here. If you're looking to gain muscle you have to eat enough. And most guys just don't really do this.

    What put you on TRT? Was there a causative factor?
    200 split is high end TRT and most really never need that amount. You'll be converting a lot into estrogen so hopefully your doc monitors this properly and controls it when needed. Is HCG involved as well?
    Beethoven likes this.

  3. #43
    Beethoven's Avatar
    Beethoven is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    South Fla
    Posts
    1,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicagotarsier View Post
    KelKel, After talking to the guys here that are on TrT in Beijing 200 is definately a self administrated dose unless the physician just "does not care".

    I take 175 mg Test P a week TrT and just got my labs back. Let me tell you it was a complete shock. Exactly 52.500 nmol/L (4.5-28 range) was total test. I am about to write a post about the BS of 200 a week TrT and the dangers from my real blood work.

    Your post is excellent.
    Chicago, and to think you still have people come on here WANTING 200 mg a week. No you know why the ambulance chasers are running wild with this.

  4. #44
    17chester6's Avatar
    17chester6 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by almostgone View Post
    In fact, I encourage you to try HIT before adding in a cycle. Look @ "Marcus diary" thread in the lounge that I mentioned in my post above.
    On page 41, Marcus posted a 5 day split that may be ideal for you. However, you really need to read the whole thread to get the full benefit from it.
    In regards to the type of workout regimen that Marcus espouses (where one not only trains five days of the week, but trains to beyond failure each time) is it assumed that the person is blasting? Would training to failure each gym day cause injury and or CNS exhaustion if I was only on regular low dose TRT? Does one need to be blasting to do this kind of workout?

  5. #45
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicagotarsier View Post
    KelKel, After talking to the guys here that are on TrT in Beijing 200 is definately a self administrated dose unless the physician just "does not care".

    I take 175 mg Test P a week TrT and just got my labs back. Let me tell you it was a complete shock. Exactly 52.500 nmol/L (4.5-28 range) was total test. I am about to write a post about the BS of 200 a week TrT and the dangers from my real blood work.

    Your post is excellent.
    Look forward to seeing your BW post chicago.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  6. #46
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Quote Originally Posted by 17chester6 View Post
    In regards to the type of workout regimen that Marcus espouses (where one not only trains five days of the week, but trains to beyond failure each time) is it assumed that the person is blasting? Would training to failure each gym day cause injury and or CNS exhaustion if I was only on regular low dose TRT? Does one need to be blasting to do this kind of workout?
    How many days you train is up to you, your goals and your schedule. HIT training does not have to be 5 days per week. And no, you do not have to be blasting but nutrition, training and rest should be on point regardless to see positive gains. Blasting / cycling obviously can help if all the aforementioned points are in place.

    Regarding injury / CNS exhaustion yes, breaks of lower intensity (think simple failure without drops, rest pause, forced reps, etc) have to be done every handful of weeks or so. Like almostgone said, read the thread. Great motivation, training info and simply a fun thread.
    almostgone likes this.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  7. #47
    BallSak is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicagotarsier View Post
    KelKel, After talking to the guys here that are on TrT in Beijing 200 is definately a self administrated dose unless the physician just "does not care".

    I take 175 mg Test P a week TrT and just got my labs back. Let me tell you it was a complete shock. Exactly 52.500 nmol/L (4.5-28 range) was total test. I am about to write a post about the BS of 200 a week TrT and the dangers from my real blood work.

    Your post is excellent.
    Your bloodwork on 175mg is relevant to you, not to another taking the same amount.

    The BS of 200? You cannot make a blanket statement like that. It would be either ignorant or arrogant. Though I agree the majority don't need this much, 200mg barely gets my free T above mid-range.

  8. #48
    Baxter35's Avatar
    Baxter35 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    632
    Needing 200mg per week is rare, but not B.S. either. I would say starting TRT at that level is the wrong way to go. Speaking from personal experience, I started at 200mg/wk under care of my primary and have since switched to a urologist who backed me down to 100/wk when my total test came back almost twice normal range.

  9. #49
    BallSak is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    391
    I agree. It's best to start low and titrate up gradually as needed. I would love to be one of the guys who only need 80-120 mg, but it is not in the cards for me. I dropped down to 180 for a while hoping I could get away with less and it dropped my free T in nearly half and I felt terrible.
    Beethoven likes this.

  10. #50
    Low Testosterone is offline ~ HRT Specialist ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,572
    Quote Originally Posted by BallSak View Post
    Your bloodwork on 175mg is relevant to you, not to another taking the same amount.

    The BS of 200? You cannot make a blanket statement like that. It would be either ignorant or arrogant. Though I agree the majority don't need this much, 200mg barely gets my free T above mid-range.
    "Relevant to you" is a good phrase everyone should keep in mind. There are often far too many blanket statements made surrounding TRT.

    As far as needing 200mg/wk, it's not rare at all. Most men do not need 200mg but plenty do, far more than what would qualify it as a "Rare" need as one of the above post stated.

  11. #51
    Baxter35's Avatar
    Baxter35 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    632
    I'll retract the "rare" classification. I was actually supporting the argument that 200mg is toward the higher side but still completely acceptable based on the individual.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •