
Originally Posted by
einstein1905
The only way I could justify PM GH is if A) money were not an issue and your doses were several fold more than natural levels, so that endogenous GH suppression would be only a minor loss (e.g. if one were taking 5IU PM and another dose AM...or something similar, so that 1-1.5IU endo GH would be relatively small relative to total dosing) or B) your own GH/IGF-1 levels were low due to age or irregular pituitary.
I know that a lot of people are against me on this one, but I'm not swayed by their arguments. They are merely shrugging off the rat studies, because they're rats. At least 15 years separate the old human GH studies that people are using for their basis of argument from the much more current rat studies, which uses much more sensitive assays. There's been nothing I've seen anywhere near current to substantiate those old GH studies using more modern, sensitive assays. Plus, logically, it doesn't make sense that there would be such a significant lag before exo GH had its effect, based on the rapid effects of endo GH.
However you do it though, I'd use the r-ALA with the GH dosings...it has a substantial effect on BG (much more than I expected). I graphed my BG over time using 200mg of r-ALA and posted it here somewhere.. At 24% bf, you'll have more aromatase activity than someone with a lower bf%, so an AI (beyond proviron) would be a good idea (which I just saw you're doing so nevermind). It's really hard to say just HOW much more aromatase activity you'll have, but you will have more.
With both the cyp and the bold undec. (even though you have the bold. acetate in there too), you won't be reaching peak plasma levels for roughly 4-6 weeks, and you're running each only 9 total. I'd start both sooner to get more weeks total at peak plasma levels of each....you won't need to change anything else in there because of it other than when you begin the adex anyway. I like the proviron with the adex the latter half to keep SHBG (and estrogen) in check.
Are you running the low dose T3 just because of the GH suppression? If so, have you always used T3 with GH?