i'm planning to do GH but a buddy of mine wants to do IGF-1 because of cost. how are the different kinds of IGF's ...different? what does one do that another doesn't?
Printable View
i'm planning to do GH but a buddy of mine wants to do IGF-1 because of cost. how are the different kinds of IGF's ...different? what does one do that another doesn't?
Bump........anyone????
rIGF-1 bind easily to IGF-1 BP, LR3 IGF-1 has 13 added amino acids which doesn't allow IGF-1 BP to bind to it very well, so you have a longer half-life. HGH helps raise IGF-1 levels in the body.
LR3 IGF-1 will give you quicker results compared to HGH, HGH is for the long haul.
JohnnyB
I've heard a lot of bros agree lr3 IGF-1 gives you the most bang for your buck. There are a lot of different opinions about the effectiveness of IGF-1, in no small part to the differences between the compounds that JohnnyB mentioned above. I'm in the process of researching this myself.
I have ran LR3 IGF-1 for 28 days and was not impressed. I had feelings of lethargy, and hardly any mass gain while off cycle. Ran it in conjunction with slin, and hit the weights hard along with getting at least 350g of protein and didn't feel any leaner, harder, stronger, or bigger when it was all said and done.
I'd spend your money on HGH if you can afford to run it for a few months.
First if you were running it as a bulker you would need more then 350 grams of protein second don't expect huge mass gains from this stuff look for at least 5 lbs of quality lean muscle tissue from it.Quote:
Originally Posted by daem
It's also possible you were a non responder or your current igf1 levels were high to begin with thus making the igf1 useless.
But all of this doesn't mean that it's worthless because for every 1 that doesn't respond there are like 5 that do.
Anybody in here used/researched GHRP-6?
At what dose were you running the IGF-1.Quote:
Originally Posted by daem