-
02-27-2005, 01:28 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 16
IGF-1 Long vs. IGF-1 Analog resistance?
Hello,
Haven't posted in a while.....I used to know the answer to this Question, but i been outta the game so long i forgot. Anyways, we all know IGF-1r3 Long needs to be cycled cuz the body develops antibodies for it. I forgot if the same is true with just plain old IGF-1 analog? Does that need to be cycled too.....or can you use it as long as you want without it losing effectivness? Thanks.
E
-
02-27-2005, 03:03 PM #2
I dont think its something to worry about as IGF-1 is very very hard to come by...
I would just use LR3 for 6 weeks... everything should be cycled anyway IMO
-
02-27-2005, 05:11 PM #3Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 2,488
Originally Posted by EJA1979
This should be common to IGF-1 and LR3. Beyond that, due to the short, short half-life of IGF-1, the multiple doseages needed to be effective are several magnitudes higher than the corresponding dose of LR3. Therefore, even though IGF-1 is available at, say, 1/4-1/6 the price of LR3 mg/mg - it is still not economically or practically as feasible, as Mr. Sparkle pointed out.
-
03-04-2005, 10:44 AM #4New Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 16
thanks
Thanks for the replies....i'm asking about plain analog IGF-1 because i want to do site specific enhancement....IGFlr3 is systemic....meaning it can attach to any IGF-1 receptor in the body......where as analog IGF only attaches where you inject it....i just want to try and augment some lagging body parts....dont want the big belly either......regular igf-1 isnt that hard to come by, you can by it straight from the manufacturer......
e
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
Today, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS