Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. 03-06-2005, 07:10 PM #1
    jgg1221
    jgg1221 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    vagina
    Posts
    840

    comparing igf1lr3 to test (any kind) for mass

    mcg to mg, which do you guys think can put on some more serious mass if used right
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-06-2005, 09:33 PM #2
    JohnnyB's Avatar
    JohnnyB
    JohnnyB is offline AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Califas
    Posts
    9,138
    Food

    JohnnyB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-06-2005, 11:23 PM #3
    jgg1221
    jgg1221 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    vagina
    Posts
    840
    i guess it does depend on how you would eat

    but i would be very curious... if i could find a study on identical twins(not that this probably exists)... one taking test prop (to quicken the results upto par with igf) and another taking igf1 lr3.... having the same exact diet and training routines
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 03-07-2005, 08:32 AM #4
    j martini
    j martini is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    924
    I would say test nothing compares to AAS. Igf, slin and Gh are more advanced compounds when you are looking something extra that AAS cannot provide.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 03-07-2005, 08:45 AM #5
    BDTR's Avatar
    BDTR
    BDTR is offline Retired
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,343
    You cant compare the gains. Test all the way.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules