GH Cycle Timing

[bigacct]

To all knowlegeable users,


Is it best to start your GH cycle a month or two before starting an AAS cycle for maximum results? Or is it best to start them both at the same time? The GH will be run for six months.

It seems that many people do it both ways, but I'd like an answer from EXPERIENCED users.

Thanks in Advance.

BA

[Jerzey]

The GH will should run longer then your cycle (unless you are like some people I know who only go off a few weeks a year).

I'm not sure it matters to start one before the other but GH works best with AAS from all that I have read.

I started my GH before AAS because it takes time to see results with GH so I figured a month or so in I would start the AAS, which is what I did.

[SPIKE]

The GH will should run longer then your cycle (unless you are like some people I know who only go off a few weeks a year).

I'm not sure it matters to start one before the other but GH works best with AAS from all that I have read.

I started my GH before AAS because it takes time to see results with GH so I figured a month or so in I would start the AAS, which is what I did.

I also did it the same way as Jerzey for a couple of reasons. One, it takes a couple of months to start seeing results form GH so I wanted to start feeling it relatively the same time as my AAS. Secondly, I've always read that after about 2 months on GH it ups your IGF levels. So by starting AAS 2 months later everything would be working synergistically.

[Pinnacle]

So by starting AAS 2 months later everything would be working synergistically.

Grasshopper-


Your wisdom exceeds your age.This is precisely how it's done.



~Pinnacle~

[SPIKE]

Grasshopper-


Your wisdom exceeds your age.This is precisely how it's done.



~Pinnacle~

I learn from the best buddy...........................so don't go far

[Jerzey]

Grasshopper-


Your wisdom exceeds your age.This is precisely how it's done.



~Pinnacle~

You crack me up...

[bigacct]

Thanks for the replies. Your knowledge will be put to good use.

BA

[johnpaul]

would it be that detrimental to start both at the same time?

Or even start the as first?

If you guys know the answer to either of those Id be eager to hear your answers. Thanks in advance J

[Pinnacle]

would it be that detrimental to start both at the same time?

Or even start the as first?

If you guys know the answer to either of those Id be eager to hear your answers. Thanks in advance J

Welcome to AR.It's impolite to jack someone else's thread.In the future start your own thread.


You can do as you please.The above protocol is what works best for most ppl.


~Pinnacle~

[Puffader]

Why you BS'ing..
Since when do you stop/start anything.. PLEASE>......!

Grasshopper-


Your wisdom exceeds your age.This is precisely how it's done.



~Pinnacle~

[Pinnacle]

Why you BS'ing..
Since when do you stop/start anything.. PLEASE>......!

LMAOOOO


For their needs that's a perfect way to do it.I prefer just to stay on year round.


~Pinnacle~

[Puffader]

Yeah buddy. Nothing but a peanut....Life is good..!

LMAOOOO


For their needs that's a perfect way to do it.I prefer just to stay on year round.


~Pinnacle~

[BOBBY D]

good info for me, this was my next question about gh. thanks big

[oswaldosalcedo]

would it be that detrimental to start both at the same time?

Or even start the as first?

If you guys know the answer to either of those Id be eager to hear your answers. Thanks in advance J

no way.

[johnpaul]

HI PAL

YOUR ANSWER, TO CLARIFY YOU MEAN ITS HAS NO DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO BE ALREADY USING AS THEN START HGH OR START THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

PINNACLE THANKS IF THAT WHAT WORKS BEST FOR YOU STICK TO IT.

AS FOR JAKING THE THREAD; SORRY BUT I FEALT THE QUESTION I ASKED WAS REALLY THE SAME QUESTION JUST ASKED IN A DIFFERENT WAY OR AT LEAST PART ANSWER TO THE ALREADY ASKED QUESTION?

EITHER WAY THANKS TO ALL WHO REPLIED

no way.

[oswaldosalcedo]

HI PAL

YOUR ANSWER, TO CLARIFY YOU MEAN ITS HAS NO DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO BE ALREADY USING AS THEN START HGH OR START THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

PINNACLE THANKS IF THAT WHAT WORKS BEST FOR YOU STICK TO IT.

AS FOR JAKING THE THREAD; SORRY BUT I FEALT THE QUESTION I ASKED WAS REALLY THE SAME QUESTION JUST ASKED IN A DIFFERENT WAY OR AT LEAST PART ANSWER TO THE ALREADY ASKED QUESTION?

EITHER WAY THANKS TO ALL WHO REPLIED

correct, is not detrimental.

[johnpaul]

THANKS OSWALD

correct, is not detrimental.

[oswaldosalcedo]

THANKS OSWALD

to your service.


objectivity-truth-science is the answer(r).



..............................