Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: subq vs IM
-
10-16-2005, 07:05 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 39
subq vs IM
does shooting hgh IM matter in terms of fatloss vs sub q?
-
10-16-2005, 07:32 PM #2
Shooting HGH IM just gets it in your system quicker.Where as Sub Q HGH will trickle in at a slower rate.
~Pinnacle~
-
10-17-2005, 08:50 AM #3
It wouldn't make any difference that would be noticable, if any at all
JohnnyB
-
10-17-2005, 06:17 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 39
wouldnt you want to hgh to release slower so you have in your system longer? I guess I am wondering what the advantage is to speeding it up as it already has a short half life?
-
10-17-2005, 06:31 PM #5Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 53
exactly why you should shoot gh subq,fat slows absorbtion
-
10-17-2005, 06:48 PM #6Originally Posted by JAMIE720
~Pinnacle~
-
10-18-2005, 07:38 PM #7New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 39
is it also true that you can have to much fat to shoot into? I am currently 12%.
-
10-18-2005, 07:45 PM #8Originally Posted by RealDeal24
-
10-18-2005, 07:47 PM #9
A comparison of subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of human growth hormone in the therapy of growth hormone deficiency
L Russo and WV Moore
The sc and im administration of human GH (hGH) was compared in the therapy of GH deficiency. The peak and integrated concentrations of hGH in the plasma of the patients were similar after sc and im injection of an initial dose (0.1 U/kg) of hGH. The peak hGH concentration occurred at 2 h in both groups. The posttreatment height velocity and the change in height velocity at 3-month intervals were also similar in the im and sc groups. The somatomedin generation test resulted in a higher mean peak of somatomedin C after sc injection; however, if the individual peaks of somatomedin C were averaged, there was no difference between sc and im injection. A cross-over at 9 months of therapy to determine patient acceptance of im vs. sc injections indicated overwhelming acceptance of the sc route. The antibody responses to hGH were similar in both groups. We conclude that sc injection of hGH is an effective and safe mode of therapy for GH deficiency. The lipoatrophy that occurred infrequently at the injection site can be eliminated by rotation of sites. Subcutaneous administration of hGH will be more acceptable by the patients with less pain and less noncompliance.
-
10-18-2005, 07:51 PM #10
I can see MM is as board as me(sick of roid forum I assume),so I'll add some info as well..in thread form though.
How to inject GH SubQ
-
10-19-2005, 09:27 PM #11
im or subc
if one were doing IM injections of HGH how would he do so? 23ga or still use slin pin?
-
10-19-2005, 09:41 PM #12Originally Posted by bigstylios
Slin pin,unless you are good enough to measure on a normal barreled syringe.
~Pinnacle~
-
10-20-2005, 11:02 PM #13
just right in the muscle? like biceps, quads, etc.? somewhere were there is little fat?
-
10-20-2005, 11:38 PM #14Originally Posted by bigstylios
~Pinnacle~
-
10-22-2005, 04:22 PM #15New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 39
i was also told that after you pinch the skin and insert the needle you let go of the skin and then inject?
-
10-22-2005, 05:19 PM #16
human growth hormone didnt work for me
and it didnt work for my bank account either
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS