Different way to cycle IGF

[TheNextBigThing]

I have noticed that lately on alot of other boards, people are talking about Dave Palumbo's method of cycling LR3. I personally have no clue if what he says has any scientific backing (mostly in regard to anything over 15mcg is useless). Does anyone have any info or thoughts on his method of cycling? Does anyone have any expirience with this type of cycling? (for the record I think it's bull)

[Steele]

i will let you know how it goes. i am gonna try palumbo's protocol to the "t" and see what happens. i think there is some merit to it. its high dose short length vs. low dose long length cycle.

[Giantz11]

Palumbo is widely regarded as a complete Jackass. Most anecdotal feedback on LR3 says you need far more then what he suggests.

[Steele]

i am sure i will try all methods of cycling with it to find out whats best. will let everyone know what results i do (or don't) get.

[JohnnyB]

I have to agree, 40mcg is the minimum dose

JohnnyB

[Steele]

johnnyB, i know you aren't a newbie to the game so i am sure you're right. at a low dose i suppose it would work poorly as a nutrient transporter too....

[SPIKE]

I've always felt 40mcg was the lowest dose until I tried it. Anything under 60 or so is useless for me. I get my best results at 70mcg+. Personally know others that get great results at 50mcg. Have to really try it for yourself to be able to really speak on it.

Palumbo's LR3 comment is spreading like wildfire. I still dont know where he came up with that........

[rodge]

for me 50mcg is bare minimum. and after 7 weeks gains fade away even with hgh in the mix.

-rodge