Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: proposed cycle

  1. #1
    bigcat3727's Avatar
    bigcat3727 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    131

    proposed cycle

    Aright guys Im still planning my cycle and have a lot of time to perfect it, probly not starting the HGH till Sept. then whatever other gear at least 4 weeks after that. I have a lot of cycle experience at least 6-7 under my belt with HGH use. Current stats 6 foot, 235lb, 9% bf. I will be looking to gain 100% quality muscle with this cycle, havent worked out my diet yet for it but Im planning on moderate carbs maybe 250-300g ed, 400g protein, I still ahve time to work that out. What does everyone think of this? Would I be better off running another compound along with the prop/tbol. And is my timing (by weeks) accurate for HGH/IGF? Any input is appreciated.

    Wk 1: 2iu HGH (5 on/2 off)
    Wk 2: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off)
    Wk 3: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off)
    Wk 4: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off)
    Wk 5: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3 (pwo), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 6: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3 (pwo), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 7: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3 (pwo), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 8: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3 (pwo), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 9: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 10: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 100mg prop ed, 90mg Tbol
    Wk 11: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), begin PCT 3rd day after last prop shot
    Wk 12: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), PCT
    Wk 13: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), PCT, 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3
    Wk 14: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), PCT, 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3
    Wk 15: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3
    Wk 16: 4iu HGH (5 on/2 off), 40-60mcg IGF1 LR3

    Possibly extending HGH to Wk 20?

  2. #2
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    If lean muscle gain is your primary objective, I would guess that a more common 10-12 week cycle of the aas and igf might be more in tune with your needs. Conventional wisdom says HGH should be used for about 6 months to really show results, so its probably not the best for a short cycle.

    I am not an expert, but I did sleep at a Holliday Inn last night.

  3. #3
    bigcat3727's Avatar
    bigcat3727 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    131
    I understand your point, I feel that I usually gain more quality muscle with short cycles, are you suggesting something like Test E and EQ for 10-12 weeks? The biggest problem I am having is developing something that will fit my needs, since I am going to be across the country on business for a month immediately after xmas day and know for a fact that my training will suffer. If I were to do something like that id probly have to start the Test E, EQ and IGF all the first week of september, which i dont want to do because common knowledge is to be on HGH at least a few weeks before AAS. Anyway suggestion on how to run it differently?

  4. #4
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by bigcat3727
    I understand your point, I feel that I usually gain more quality muscle with short cycles, are you suggesting something like Test E and EQ for 10-12 weeks? The biggest problem I am having is developing something that will fit my needs, since I am going to be across the country on business for a month immediately after xmas day and know for a fact that my training will suffer. If I were to do something like that id probly have to start the Test E, EQ and IGF all the first week of september, which i dont want to do because common knowledge is to be on HGH at least a few weeks before AAS. Anyway suggestion on how to run it differently?
    I heard it both ways regarding using hgh before or after starting the test. I really don't know which is correct. Personally I think you would be better off starting in september and taking January off. But if a conventional cycle won't fit your needs, you might have to experiment to see what works for you.

    Your proposed cycle does not look dangerous, so I don't think you have any serious downside to giving it a shot. Hope some of the folks that have experience with this combo or short cycles chime in.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •