Why the hating?

**gettnthere** · 08-08-2006, 08:09 AM

I have been searching around the web for info on side-effects on LR3 IGF-1 and came across some serious hating of Lions IGF? Why are these fvckin guys saying it causes mad cow disease? BSA or HSA i think it was cause it and was being claimed it was in his IGF.

I honestly am not too affected by those statements,there will always be haters, but he was talking death,immune system damage,some serious shitt that will make any normal person think twice about using. obviously no one on this board will back the hater dude,but does anyone have any way to proove the guy wrong for sure? oh and is the steroid -peptides sponsor different than Lion?

**rodge** · 08-08-2006, 08:15 AM

i'm not touching this one.

all i can say is that lion defended his product and it indeed was tested as receptor grade but none the less it was removed from his list and a media grade took its place.

-rodge

**comradebillyboy** · 08-08-2006, 08:15 AM

some members are overly loyal to the people they buy their stuff from and get in pissing contests over whose products are better. Some of the folks involved have a financial intrest in one supplier or another and will smear their competitors. Some folks, like Roge, provide a sane rationale for their opinions. Personally, I doubt that there is much difference between one company's product and anothers.

**Homeguard** · 08-08-2006, 08:20 AM

I am assuming you mean BSE.

There is still much debate in the scientific community regarding how BSE is spread. At the present time, BSE is thought to be spread in tissue from the central nervous system (brain, spinal cord) as well as distal ileum, some of which can be present in meat and bone meal. BSE is not spread by animal-to-animal contact. In other words, an animal infected with BSE cannot infect another animal with which it is penned or pastured. Little is known regarding the minimum amount of prion material that can cause an infection.

With this in mind I can't understand why they think BSE (or vCJD) could be "caught" from IGF

**gixxerboy1** · 08-08-2006, 09:24 AM

Most of the igf sources will admit they all get there stuff from the same company in china

**boxingbean** · 08-08-2006, 10:32 AM

dont hate, discriminate......wait......?

***perfectbeast2001*** · 08-08-2006, 11:37 AM

it was BSA that was touted as being in the IGF. Lion admitted it was in there and it was also present in other igfs and also in all the HCG we use. Someone from a rival board was just trying to make a big issue out of it. Im using it now and im alright... MOOOO MOOOO

RA · 08-08-2006, 11:55 AM

Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001

it was BSA that was touted as being in the IGF. Lion admitted it was in there and it was also present in other igfs and also in all the HCG we use. Someone from a rival board was just trying to make a big issue out of it. Im using it now and im alright... MOOOO MOOOO

Were you talking to me?

**RUI-Products** · 08-08-2006, 05:35 PM

Ok I will put this to rest. To Lyophilize anything the glass must be coated with an agent to keep the peptide from bonding to the glass. Sterile milk Powder is what is used. Milk contains BSA. IT is sterile. BSA is in every Dariy product you have ever had.

It is imposible to lyophilize a peptide without coating the glass and the rubber septum. The idiots who brought this up have no understanding of the scientific procedure in producing or packaging peptides.

I will submitt THere is no IGF-1 LR3 comming out of China. The chinese can't make it. What they are selling is not IGF-1 Lr3.

We don't buy from the same supliers the others are.

Our Peptides are all safe.