Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: igf-1 protocal

  1. #1
    Titan1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    619

    igf-1 protocal

    what do you guys think about this protocal? isnt injecting 3x week to little?

    have probably done more igf cycles than just about any guy here. I have tried every method possible and after doing all this research I have come to a few conclusions.

    Igf does not need to be in high dosages. More is definitely not better. Igf is very synergistic when used in conjunction with androgens more so than anabolics. Igf has a very short half life, shorter than most initial studies show, new studies are more accurate.

    I have done the standard 50-60mcg ed for 6 weeks. Tried a 12 week cycle. Did a 4 week on, 4 week off. Did really high doses at 200mcg per day. Tried high dose 3 times per week post workout, etc. As I said I have tried them all.

    Here is what I have come up with based on my research and using my body as a guinee pig. Since igf has a very short half life, many injections are needed. Igf can saturate cells quickly, thereby necessitating an irregular schedule to prevent downregulation of the cells. Low doses work better.

    Look at it this way, part of the reason gh works in an anabolic state is the small conversion to igf. This conversion is much smaller than the amounts we inject. Igf has a very small chain structure not unlike insulin . You can become resistant similar to insulin use, therefore, infrequent dosing is best.

    Here is what I am currently doing and getting better results than my first igf cycle when I had virgin receptors. I am taking 60mcg per day spread out into 4 shots. I inject 2 muscle groups per day each side with 15mcg for a total of 60mcg for the day. I too, have noticed localized growth, whether it is anectodal or not. So I do 15mcg in one bicep before breakfast. 4 hours later I do the other bicep with 15mcg. 4 hours later I do a delt with 15mcg and then 4 hours after that I do my last inject with 15mcg in the other delt.

    I only do this 3 times per week so I can keep my receptors fresh, prevent saturation and downregulation and optimize my dosages without needing to use ever increasing doses. I do 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, though theoritically and I have yet to test this, I should be able to do at least a 20 week cycle because of the minimal downregulation.

    I came up with this theory after talking to some pro's (some post here, you know who you are) and talking with other about insulin and minimal cycling theories about slin. Since igf is such a similar structure, following a less is more approach has brought on fantastic results.

    Try it and let me know how well it works for you. I am always looking for more guinee pigs in my research studies.
    AP

  2. #2
    Random is offline RETIRED VET
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,368
    Very interesting, if it works that would be great for those short on funds like myself!....good info, someones gotta do it!

  3. #3
    perfectbeast2001's Avatar
    perfectbeast2001 is offline "king of free stuff" / Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    very interesting post. I wil bear this in mind for next run of igf.

  4. #4
    ss01 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    204
    Ah, so nice and refreshing to someone doing some acutal experimentation rather than just going "more=better". Smarter == Better.

    Glad to hear about the results, and looking forward to updates.

  5. #5
    llrockyll's Avatar
    llrockyll is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    580
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan1
    what do you guys think about this protocal? isnt injecting 3x week to little?

    have probably done more igf cycles than just about any guy here. I have tried every method possible and after doing all this research I have come to a few conclusions.

    Igf does not need to be in high dosages. More is definitely not better. Igf is very synergistic when used in conjunction with androgens more so than anabolics. Igf has a very short half life, shorter than most initial studies show, new studies are more accurate.

    I have done the standard 50-60mcg ed for 6 weeks. Tried a 12 week cycle. Did a 4 week on, 4 week off. Did really high doses at 200mcg per day. Tried high dose 3 times per week post workout, etc. As I said I have tried them all.

    Here is what I have come up with based on my research and using my body as a guinee pig. Since igf has a very short half life, many injections are needed. Igf can saturate cells quickly, thereby necessitating an irregular schedule to prevent downregulation of the cells. Low doses work better.

    Look at it this way, part of the reason gh works in an anabolic state is the small conversion to igf. This conversion is much smaller than the amounts we inject. Igf has a very small chain structure not unlike insulin . You can become resistant similar to insulin use, therefore, infrequent dosing is best.

    Here is what I am currently doing and getting better results than my first igf cycle when I had virgin receptors. I am taking 60mcg per day spread out into 4 shots. I inject 2 muscle groups per day each side with 15mcg for a total of 60mcg for the day. I too, have noticed localized growth, whether it is anectodal or not. So I do 15mcg in one bicep before breakfast. 4 hours later I do the other bicep with 15mcg. 4 hours later I do a delt with 15mcg and then 4 hours after that I do my last inject with 15mcg in the other delt.

    I only do this 3 times per week so I can keep my receptors fresh, prevent saturation and downregulation and optimize my dosages without needing to use ever increasing doses. I do 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, though theoritically and I have yet to test this, I should be able to do at least a 20 week cycle because of the minimal downregulation.

    I came up with this theory after talking to some pro's (some post here, you know who you are) and talking with other about insulin and minimal cycling theories about slin. Since igf is such a similar structure, following a less is more approach has brought on fantastic results.

    Try it and let me know how well it works for you. I am always looking for more guinee pigs in my research studies.
    AP
    He's talking about rhIGF-1 not LR3 IGF-1

  6. #6
    pscarb's Avatar
    pscarb is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    124
    that would make sense as he does mention the very short half life of the IGF-1

  7. #7
    Titan1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    619
    I found it over at bolex but i asked the same question and they said that it was Lr3 he is talking about?!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •