Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: targex

  1. #1
    darkwing's Avatar
    darkwing is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56

    targex

    Has anyone used targex? Would a little DMSO help with
    Targex?

  2. #2
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Hello,

    TargeX does not contain any DMSO and it does not needed. Why would you want to use DMSO ?

    TargeX works only for localized fat loss not water loss like other products do.

    Thanks,

    C

  3. #3
    darkwing's Avatar
    darkwing is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    56
    Thanks, just checkin

  4. #4
    gq3856 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    66
    has anyone tried it and gotten good results

  5. #5
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlito B
    Hello,

    TargeX does not contain any DMSO and it does not needed. Why would you want to use DMSO ?

    TargeX works only for localized fat loss not water loss like other products do.

    Thanks,

    C
    Does that localized fat loss translate to actual weight loss? If not where doe the fat go?

  6. #6
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
    Does that localized fat loss translate to actual weight loss? If not where doe the fat go?
    Hello,

    Localized fat loss is not the same as bodyweight loss.

    HUGE difference.

    Thanks,

    C

  7. #7
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
    Does that localized fat loss translate to actual weight loss? If not where doe the fat go?
    Hello,

    Localized fat loss is not the same as bodyweight loss.

    HUGE difference.

    Thanks,

    C

  8. #8
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
    Does that localized fat loss translate to actual weight loss? If not where doe the fat go?
    Hello,

    Localized fat loss is not the same as bodyweight loss.

    HUGE difference.

    Thanks,

    C

  9. #9
    MoneyAddyct is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    851
    If one loses localized fat deposits, how does that not transfer to at least some amount of weight loss?

  10. #10
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlito B
    Hello,

    Localized fat loss is not the same as bodyweight loss.

    HUGE difference.

    Thanks,

    C
    thanks, please explain where the fat goes, my education is all physics and math not biology.

  11. #11
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
    thanks, please explain where the fat goes, my education is all physics and math not biology.

    Hello,

    First and foremost sorry for the triple post not sure what happened, my education is in..well I have no education but I am a successful businessman I can say that.

    I do not get tired of posting this same study and will keep doing it until is needed, BTW I'd like to thank Nandi (RIP ) who was an inspiration, enough said.

    Glycyrrhetinic acid, the active principle of licorice, can reduce the thickness of subcutaneous thigh fat through topical application.

    Armanini D, Nacamulli D, Francini-Pesenti F, Battagin G, Ragazzi E, Fiore C.

    Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-Endocrinology, University of Padua, Via Ospedale 105, 35100 Padua, Italy.


    Cortisol is involved in the distribution and deposition of fat, and its action is regulated by the activity of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Glycyrrhetinic acid, the active principle of licorice root, blocks 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1, thus reducing the availability of cortisol at the level of adipocytes. We evaluated the effect of topical application of a cream containing glycyrrhetinic acid in the thickness of fat at the level of the thigh. Eighteen healthy women (age range 20-33 years) with normal BMI were randomly allocated to treatment, at the level of the dominant thigh, with a cream containing 2.5% glycyrrhetinic acid (n=9) or with a placebo cream containing the excipients alone (n=9). Before and after 1 month of treatment both the circumference and the thickness of the superficial fat layer of the thighs (by ultrasound analysis) were measured. The circumference and the thickness of the superficial fat layer were significantly reduced in comparison to the controlateral untreated thigh and to control subjects treated with the placebo cream. No changes were observed in blood pressure, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone or cortisol. The effect of glycyrrhetinic acid on the thickness of subcutaneous fat was likely related to a block of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 at the level of fat cells; therefore, glycyrrhetinic acid could be effectively used in the reduction of unwanted local fat accumulation.

    If you read the original abstract you will note that ...

    "No changes were observed in blood pressure, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone or cortisol",

    There was no change in plasma cortisol; cortisol was lowered only in the fat cells, this is telling us that little if any of the compound was absorbed systemically or we would see a drop in whole body, i.e. plasma cortisol.

    I would also like to add that fat can be used as fuel and that is how or "wher the fat goes"


    Thanks!

    Carlito
    Former UGLab owner now retired and currently proud onwer of a legitimate business !
    Last edited by Carlito B; 09-10-2006 at 07:25 PM.

  12. #12
    comradebillyboy's Avatar
    comradebillyboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    albuquerque, nm
    Posts
    294
    Thanks for the info

  13. #13
    MoneyAddyct is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    851
    I'm not sure that really answered the question. Targex reduces the thickness of subcutaneous fat. Ok. And fat can be used as fuel and "that's where the fat goes." Ok. All that makes sense. Targex reduces fat thickness, that fat is then used as fuel and that's where it goes. But doesn't the expenditure of fuel (which, was the fat) lead to a loss in weight? It seems logically inconsistent that there can be a reduction in fat but not a reduction in even an infinitesimal amount of weight and the study that you provided does not say that fat loss will not occur.

  14. #14
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneyAddyct
    I'm not sure that really answered the question. Targex reduces the thickness of subcutaneous fat. Ok. And fat can be used as fuel and "that's where the fat goes." Ok. All that makes sense. Targex reduces fat thickness, that fat is then used as fuel and that's where it goes. But doesn't the expenditure of fuel (which, was the fat) lead to a loss in weight? It seems logically inconsistent that there can be a reduction in fat but not a reduction in even an infinitesimal amount of weight and the study that you provided does not say that fat loss will not occur.
    Indeed sir, TargeX DOES NOT CAUSE overall systemic fat loss , ONLY LOCALIZED FAT LOSS which can is visible. If you want to lose bodyweight then Clenbuterol , T3 or even E/C/Y stack will do the job.

    Thanks,

    C

  15. #15
    MoneyAddyct is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    851
    I know that Targex does not cause overall systemic fat loss. That was neither my question nor was it comradebillyboy's. The question was, does the LOCALIZED fat loss translate into an actual loss, no matter how small, in body weight. You said NO, provided a study, and in addition mentioned that "the fat can be used as fuel and that's "where the fat goes." Neither the study nor your comment did anything to bolster your initial answer--that NO, the localized fat loss does not translate to WEIGHT loss. What is missing here is an explanation as to HOW a decrease in localized fat loss DOES NOT lead to a decrease in body weight.

  16. #16
    Surferboy's Avatar
    Surferboy is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    NoWhere, TX
    Posts
    321
    Does anyone know how this will work on puffy nipples? Yohimburn made a slight difference, but could this be better?

  17. #17
    Carlito B is offline Big Pimp
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    216
    Moneyaddict,

    I see now, well obviously there will be some "body weight loss" if some "localized fat" is lost, I still feel safe to say than when there is fat oxidation this is used as fuel, just how our body works and not difficult to understand. I know of people that has used TargeX claiming of losing 4 to 6 Lbs. after 2 weeks of administration. Also TargeX seems to work well on women and also have helped reduce cellulite. I have proof of this and I will ask this lady who is a VET and MOD on other boards if she would please visit this forum and comfirn this, I would ask others who are not members of this board but members on UG boards to post their feedback, TargeX has been in the underground market for more than 2 years now.

    Surferboy,

    Yes sir! TargeX will help at reducing subcutaneous fat in your chest area as long as it is not gyno. Still TargeX has mild antiestrogen properties but that still yet to be proven.


    Thanks,

    C

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •