Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
03-09-2007, 11:48 PM #1
IGF-1R3 Localized growth = False ??
a lot of experienced bros are saying that localized growth is completely false from IGF-1R3. what are your opinions on that statement ??
-
03-09-2007, 11:55 PM #2
Wondering the same thing here. I was thinking about useing SMALL amounts shot into lagging muscles to bring them up over time. I've read that it gets picked up in the area it's shot first before it really gets into your blood stream. So if the amount was small enough wouldn't it bind to the local cells first, and since there's not enough to do anything for anywhere else wouldn't that be localized? But maybe it's just me thinking crazy again.
-
03-10-2007, 12:42 AM #3
personally never noticed any localized growth
also never read solid evidence of localized growth
-
03-10-2007, 11:27 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 20
I have gotten the IGF R13 from...................at one point they were selling it, don't know if they still are, and I was informed to inject it into a certain muscle. I also bought the HGH from them on credit card which I have not scene on the NET before. A bit more expensive but I can afford it. However, not being a GURU using the IGF R13 I felt really shaky and or hunger. Weird. Maybe I was taking it wrong. But their Jintropin is incredible. I have been on for 6 months now and the vascularity is awesome. Anyone else try this site or have luck with other sites? Thanks
Last edited by Pluna6000; 03-11-2007 at 01:28 AM. Reason: Not allowed
-
03-10-2007, 11:28 PM #5Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 20
Sorry meant to say IGF 1R3
-
03-10-2007, 11:28 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 20
Sorry meant to say IGF 1R3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS