Thinking about gh cycle

**Bio-Active** · 07-02-2008, 07:23 PM

Hi all,

I am considering running a gh only cycle. I was wondering with my diet and training in check what kind of results would i see long term. I am thinking of running 4 ui a day for six months. thinking of doing just gh because my body just cant handle the sides of aas. My stats are 5 foot 4 inches. 147 lbs. about 10 % bodyfat, 37 yrs old and been training hard for 6 yrs. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks in advance

**Gear** · 07-02-2008, 08:38 PM

It really depends on what you want to achieve. HGH alone will deliver some fat loss and well being benefits, but if you are after muscle mass I suggest you add AAS to your HGH cycle. HGH alone certainly has the potential for muscle gains but adding AAS will boost things a little.

The dose once again depends on what you want to achieve as well as your age. At age 37, you will still more than likely need about 3 - 4IU p/day if you are after fat loss and a minimum of 5IU p/day for muscle gains.

All the best.

-Gear

**Bio-Active** · 07-03-2008, 06:29 PM

Thank you for the quick reply! So i am considering this cycle because of the fact that my body just cannot handle the sides of aas. I have put on alot of muscle over the years of training. What kind of sides do you think i could expect from a dose like this of growth. I would think they would not be near as extreme as the sides of my last test cycle. thanks in advance

**Gear** · 07-03-2008, 07:45 PM

If you start on a lower dose (2 - 3IU) and increase the dose slowly you shouldn't experience any sides really. If anything, you may get some minor joint pain but not much more than that.

-Gear

**Bio-Active** · 07-04-2008, 05:30 PM

Thank you so much for the info. Would it be safe to say at that gyno would not be an issue. I am pretty sensitive to gyno with test. Never developed it but nipples were pretty sensative during test only cycle. Thanks

**Timm1704** · 07-05-2008, 03:59 AM

in theory GH alone would have no bearing on your sex hormones and therefore no risk of gynocomastia. Saying that, there was a guy who posts here that claimed GH caused gyno with himself, but i dont think that could have been the cause.

The risk is minimal, if it even exists

**Bio-Active** · 07-05-2008, 09:41 AM

thanks and i will keep you guys posted as the cycle goes!!

**Pinnacle** · 07-05-2008, 09:54 AM

Originally Posted by jim230027

I have put on alot of muscle over the years of training.

147 pounds at 37 yrs old isn't a lot of muscle by any means.

If you think you are going to grow using HGH alone, you are going to be one disappionted person.

**Bio-Active** · 07-05-2008, 12:05 PM

So do you believe i would have to add the test back in and just deal with the sides or should i say control the sides with AI. I do know how to eat right. Currently eating 6 meals a day. first 4 meals are 40 grams protien and 50 grams carbs. Meals 5 and 6 are 40 grams protien and greens.

**Timm1704** · 07-05-2008, 12:21 PM

what cant you handle from the test?

**Bio-Active** · 07-05-2008, 12:25 PM

the sensitive nipples.

**Bio-Active** · 07-05-2008, 04:32 PM

I may not have made my goals clear in the beginning of this post. I do recognize that at 5"4 i am certainly not a monster by any means but over the years i have gained alot of strength compared to were i started. I have learned alot over the years about how to manipulate my diet to achieve my goals. when i first started lifting i was told just to eat big to get big and i did. I got alot stronger but put on more fat during the process than i would have liked. Then i learned how to diet and was able to get that fat off and maintain close to the same strength. Now i do no that you cannot put on size without putting on some fat. MY goal is to stay as lean as possible. Hoping to get shredded and if i can put on a little muscle that would be great. I am not looking to be the biggest guy in the gym or a pro bodybuilder by any means. so the goal would be to try and be at a lean 155 or 160. Is this possible with HGH or would i need to add the test to the mix. I am planning on bodybuilding for the rest of my life so this is not a short term goal. Thanks in advance

**Timm1704** · 07-06-2008, 02:00 AM

test/AAS in general would make these goals more realistic for sure, have you tried using anti estrogens with your cycles?

PT · 07-06-2008, 03:24 AM

if your looking for mass then test and deca will suit you alot better then hgh. even if your dead stuck on using hgh for mass you'll need at least 6-10ius a day and it should also be run with a cycle or 2 of steroids and possibly slin if you have experiance with it