IGF1-R3 or HGH

**ollieolson99** · 12-31-2008, 12:27 AM

Whats better in your guys opinion? Igf1-r3 or HGH? As far as overall results and exp go...joint repair, muscle gain, fat lose etc. Just from exp or whta you've heard.

**peptide** · 12-31-2008, 08:52 AM

IGF-LR3 is in no way as potent as HGH especially when it comes to fat loss. Also, with IGF-LR3, which is a synthetically modified hormone, you need to be a bit more concerned about your body creating anti-bodies to IGF. Because of this you really don't want to take IGF-LR3 for more than 12 weeks.

Where as 191aa HGH you can take this indefinitely and is the same hormone that's made by the pituitary. If given the choice I'd take the HGH over IGF every time.

**jg42058p** · 12-31-2008, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by peptide

IGF-LR3 is in no way as potent as HGH especially when it comes to fat loss. Also, with IGF-LR3, which is a synthetically modified hormone, you need to be a bit more concerned about your body creating anti-bodies to IGF. Because of this you really don't want to take IGF-LR3 for more than 12 weeks.

Where as 191aa HGH you can take this indefinitely and is the same hormone that's made by the pituitary. If given the choice I'd take the HGH over IGF every time.

Agreed 100%

If taken IGF1 LR3 before and didn't even notice much of any gains. All I hear about HGH is that it is probably the best anabolic substance known to man... where as IGF1LR3 is essentially worthless.