-
11-13-2008, 08:05 PM #1
HGH and Mass - Why waste of Money?
I read this on another post and instead of Hijacking I ask here
Why is HGH for Mass waste of money ?
Many would say roids will give most bang for the buck, quick results - but that is temp, stop roids and and lose mass even though you keep your diet and workout regimen the same. So multiple cycles, roller coaster hormones, PCT etc
HGH though longer for the effect brings about hyperplasia - more perm. growth that you keep and grow. I say more money upfront but keepable gains with less pain and issues in general
Comments?
-
11-13-2008, 08:17 PM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
To grow with HGH you need slin and AAS.Most people on this board dont need to think about using HGH for growth,you need 8iu at least with the other things I talked about too.but people can afford HGH these days with cheap blue tops.
-
11-14-2008, 03:38 AM #3
why is it a waste of money? because it sucks at putting on mass and test can do a way better job in shorter time. if you want to gain mass with hgh then you should stack it with slin for best results but you definatly need test in there
-
11-14-2008, 09:00 AM #4Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 477
Depending on your sources but I would venture to guess that building mass with GH will cost upwards of 10x what AAS would cost. 5iu-10iu/day X 6 months (minimum) will get very expensive. If you are young (under 30) it will cost more.
-
11-14-2008, 11:26 AM #5
Great - I will run test with HGH
Do I absolutely need slin for mass or Test and HGH on its own should be good?
-
11-14-2008, 12:58 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
-
11-14-2008, 09:40 PM #7
You need to do some homework or ****ing with slin will kill you
-
11-14-2008, 09:54 PM #8
-
11-15-2008, 12:43 PM #9
HGH + test is your best recepie for muscle mass. Anything else you add is not necessaraly necessary and is only there for additional benefits.
-Gear
-
11-19-2008, 05:29 PM #10
I started taking hgh for keepable mass. Bone, muscle, joints, or whatever (I don't care). Ive got a tall, thin frame. Am I wasting my time with 4iu/day? (with test).
-
11-19-2008, 05:50 PM #11Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 477
-
11-19-2008, 06:00 PM #12
-
11-19-2008, 08:05 PM #13Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 477
-
11-19-2008, 10:04 PM #14
5/2, 6/1 and ED are all great protocols. In terms of noticable gains you won't notice any difference no matter which protocol you follow.
-Gear
-
11-20-2008, 12:12 AM #15
Ok thanks for the advice. Its just that I am primarily interested in changing up the genetics a bit, but I keep seeing posts here and there where people talk about needing 8-10iu/day for any significant mass gains. When I see those posts it makes me second guess my cycle plan.
-
11-20-2008, 06:06 AM #16
dosage will depend on your age. usually you will need at least 6ius with test in order to gain mass. 3 or 4ius of hgh is just to low of a dose to see any mass gains whatsoever
-
11-20-2008, 09:42 PM #17
Crap! I hate readin posts like that. Thanks for the heads up. I hate the message, not the messenger. I thought I'd done enough homework before jumpin on this 4iu/ day for mass cycle. Im breakin the bank as it is. I guess Im gonna have to up the dose and rob a bank or somethin. Naa ill figure out a way. By the way, im 28. I am runnin test with it.
-
11-21-2008, 09:21 AM #18Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 477
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
Today, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS