Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: is sub-q best for HGH?? why not IM??

  1. #1

    is sub-q best for HGH?? why not IM??

    just curious

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    292
    I do Sub-Q...but have heard IM is just as good if not better....But don't take my word for it...ask the pros.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    48
    I've done both. Not sure if I notice a difference. I do it Im now. Just makes more sense to me. And I do EOD

  4. #4
    if you do IM you still use 29gauge insulin needles or 22g 1 1/2''???

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,750
    insulin.

  6. #6
    ideal shot for IM are ::: the shoulder? the thigh? the butt? any suggestions as to where to try IM my HGH?

  7. #7
    IM provides a better rate of absorption when compared to sub-Q injections. This is because it's being absorbed from the muscle rather then fatty tissue.

    Some shoot GH exclusively IM, but most stick to Sub-Q injections as it's the least "invasive" form of shooting (not to mention depending on your dosage you may need to inject 1 - 2 times per day = potential for lots of scare tissue..)

    Your call

    -VM

  8. #8
    vitruvian,
    where would i shoot IM for the HGH....if im gonna spend the money i want the most absorption

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens,Greece
    Posts
    213
    when i do IM , i usually do to triceps and chest ...

  10. #10
    I do im in shoulders and works great for me.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •