Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: IGF-1 and LR3
-
06-20-2010, 12:49 PM #1
IGF-1 and LR3
Sorry if this is a dumb post but I have asked a good bit lately on opinions of IGF and have read a lot of other threads about IGF and I am now a believer that LR3 is crap and IGF-1 is better... my question is why in the heck does everyone sell LR3 and not the origional IGF-1. I know LR3 is just an altered form but why did they do this if it was junk and why not go back to what we know is better?
Any inpout would be nice as curiosity is driving me nuts!
-
06-20-2010, 12:58 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,294
IGF-1 is better compund but it's a lot more difficult to synthesize and sell. It's the law of supply and demand. It'll be really expensive if it's real IGF-1.
-
06-20-2010, 01:06 PM #3
Thanks ScotchGuard that was driving me nutts why no one has it!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS