Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: injecting im vs in fat
-
10-04-2011, 11:26 AM #1
injecting im vs in fat
what are the pros and cons to each when it comes to injecting hgh into muscle and injecting hgh into fat?
-
10-04-2011, 04:23 PM #2
Never heard of injecting into the muscle before just subq really
-
10-04-2011, 06:12 PM #3
i always do sub-q. IM would make it get absorbed faster. Not sure if there is any benefit or dissavantage. I know when some people used to get welts from the old chinese gh doing in the muscle would sometimes help that
-
10-04-2011, 10:36 PM #4
seems like a lot of work to do nothing really.jmo
-
10-05-2011, 06:04 AM #5
You are correct, IM increases the rate of absorption and clearing time. When pinning HGH post GHRP/GHRH injection IM is preferred because the clearing time is shortened so the body treats this HGH as more of a huge endogenous spike of GH. Also, for those pin HGH multiple times per day IM would be preferred as pulsation is what we are after. The body naturally releases GH in pulses throughout the day so pinning HGH IM multiple times during the day will mimic the bodies natural GH release. Another plus to injecting HGH IM is the bodies endogenous production of GH is inhibited for less time, so endogenous GH production restarts more quickly compared to sub q.
-
10-06-2011, 01:46 AM #6
Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- San Diego & Las Vegas
- Posts
- 533
Sub-q is easier and I think GH incinerates fat in the local area IE=inject in your lower mid section
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
High alt and ast
07-11-2024, 09:20 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS