Results 1 to 13 of 13
Thread: Considering HGH
-
06-20-2012, 11:28 AM #1
Considering HGH
Hey all,
I have recently been offered over a year and half long prescription of hgh........ I was thinking I might run this to bridge my next cycle I was thinking I would start it a week after my last test injection (Sust) and run it for 12-16 weeks until I start my test prop winny cycle
I'm 24
On my 4th cycle
Which is 500mg test week 1-14750mg deca week 1-12 40mg winny tabs week 11-14
I would just like some input from people who have run this I was thinking 4iu Ed but have read some run 5 on 2 off
Was just wondering what you thought.
-
06-20-2012, 12:50 PM #2
runnung for 12-16 weeks is a waste, you need to use it for 6 months min
at 24 it really cost effective for the resultsIf people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
06-20-2012, 07:21 PM #3Originally Posted by gixxerboy1
What dose would you run it at ?
-
06-20-2012, 07:45 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
you produce roughly 2 i.u per day naturally so to be worth shutting down your natty production and make it worth while you need to run 4 i.u minimum just to make it worth shutting down your endogenous gh, which at 4i.u wont even give great results, the AAS will achieve far more and it needs to be run for alot longer then 16weeks which will be very expensive if its coming form a pharmacy, just my opinion
Last edited by DanB; 06-20-2012 at 07:47 PM.
-
06-20-2012, 08:12 PM #5Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 2,571
I feel that GH is a lot better when use when you are older, still trying to figure out a few things, 1-2IU work good for me so far. But has the guys say here at 24 AAS will work a lot better and be a lot cheaper.
-
06-20-2012, 11:56 PM #6
Cheers for the feed back does anyone know the costs of filling a prescription in Australia?
I will probably hold of for a while
-
06-21-2012, 12:06 AM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
Havnt a clue but if you keep bumping this thread I'm sure one of the aussies will see it.......
-
06-29-2012, 01:01 PM #8
I would think it's the same as here in the US without a script.
-
06-29-2012, 02:59 PM #9
GH is a long term commitment. At 24 using 4iu I doubt you'll see any significant effect and certainly not at 16 weeks. It's not a miracle drug and like any hormone based therapies, changes are gradual and long term. 5/2 or 3/2 are common use protocols. 3 months on (daily) followed by 1 month off is another less used but equally effective protocol.
If you're gonna go with GH, commit yourself to a long term protocol and significant investment. Anything less is a waste of time and money.
-
06-30-2012, 05:05 PM #10
IMO, HGH at 24 just isn't worth the money. You can get much better results with diet, cardio and a good AAS cycle. You can, with effort, get into sub 10% bf with the diet, cardio, AAS combo. Old guys like me are the ones that need some help with HGH.
-
06-30-2012, 07:18 PM #11Originally Posted by ScotchGuard02
-
07-02-2012, 12:55 AM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 56
4iu 5/2 for 6 months would be worth it for results?
-
07-02-2012, 01:18 AM #13Originally Posted by Syztem
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS