Thread: HGH Home Testing
-
02-05-2013, 02:13 PM #1
HGH Home Testing
This is a re-post from another forum that I confirmed (by other Bio Chemist) is a acknowledged way to test your HGH batch. Posted by Clit_Shredder:
As a molecular biochemist that routinely works with Peptides I can tell you guys a simple test that you can do at home to see if your HGH is the real deal. Also, for those of you that have red welts, itching, and sore spots at injection sites, I will explain here briefly what is likely going on.
You all know the HCG test with the pregnancy strips so I won't go into that. To test you HGH,
1. Reconstitute it.
2. Bring a pot of water to a boil.
3. Put your HGH vial (which you are sacrificing) into the boiling water for 2 min.
4. Look to see if the solution turns milky/cloudy white.
If your HGH is real it will turn cloudy/milky white after this procedure.
5. Let the vial set aside at room temperature for one day.
6. If the solution becomes clear again and you don't see any milkiness then the HGH is fake.
Posted below is a COA obtained from a large manufacturer. Note the contaminants that are commonly found in HGH powders and their threshold limit values per WHO regulations. HGH is produced through recombinant gene expression in E. Coli bacteria. These bacteria produce a lot of toxins in the manufacturing process that are painstakingly removed from the HGH whilst maintaining HGH in its active form.
Depending on the quality of the isolation process varying amounts of these toxins will be present in the powder. Even the most expensive HGH preparations will contain at least some of these toxins. These bacterial produced toxins are likely the cause of many of the skin reactions reported here as they are triggers for the body’s immune response. They are nothing to worry about so long as they are not present in any lethal quantity which they are nowhere near.
Hope that clears things up for everyone.
-
02-05-2013, 02:33 PM #2
I've heard about this before but it seemed after some testing it proved inconclusive.
-
02-05-2013, 02:39 PM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 377
-
02-05-2013, 06:05 PM #4
its been posted before its BS
If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
02-05-2013, 06:19 PM #5Originally Posted by gixxerboy1
-
02-05-2013, 07:02 PM #6
Yep bs !! If people in china are smart enough for it to bs your blood work I'm sure becoming cloudy or wat not can be faked as well... who's to say a peptide won't do this...
Seen this post a year or so ago
-
02-05-2013, 07:17 PM #7
I wish it was this easy to test.
-
02-05-2013, 08:00 PM #8
Re-post from another forum written by Clit_Shredder. Note to thread: "I also confirmed this with a friend who is a BioChemist". Just additional information to read about.
HGH denatures irreversibly however and so heat denaturing without any noticeable renaturing of the native and active protein structure would show that the HGH was in fact real. Yes, the HGH could be substituted with other heat sensitive proteins that don't reversibly renature, but these proteins are exclusively used in research. I can tell you from experience that such proteins are far more expensive than HGH. This would make sense since they are just as difficult to extract in active form, and are not being used by hundreds of thousands of people for medical purposes.
So, bottom line; if you have a protein that denatures in heat irreversibly, it is either HGH, or an enzyme/protein that is at least as expensive (more likely a lot more expensive).
-
02-05-2013, 08:05 PM #9
Where's Bonaparte and Atomini when we need them. I'm still not buying into this. I've seen too many knock offs that find ways around these tests through false positives or false negatives to believe anything other than a spectral analysis or some other analytical chemistry test or blood work done to measure IGF-1 levels.
-
02-05-2013, 09:49 PM #10
-
02-05-2013, 09:59 PM #11Originally Posted by gixxerboy1
-
02-06-2013, 12:45 AM #12
Ok let's find the thread and post it. Many of us cannot afford U.S grade HGH. I myself just ordered Jintropin from Ukraine. Why? cause its affordable BS HGH.
Also call it BS but I so spoke to a BioChemist friend and she stated yes the test would work for a simple home test. Hey it's something to consider. My Rips tested positive for HGH. Call it BS but its good to go for me. So anyone calling it BS should post some info for the rest of us to consider. Easy to talk, harder to write.Last edited by testluva; 02-06-2013 at 01:14 AM.
-
02-06-2013, 07:09 AM #13
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...t#.URJTbJhqsRk
This whole idea of this gh "testing method" is so stupid it makes my head hurt.
-
02-06-2013, 07:13 AM #14
Agreed ^^ not this bs rumour again
Its nearly as stupid as generic being real hgh
-
02-06-2013, 11:20 AM #15
Ok I got it now. I'll just stick to my Jin from Ukraine. Thanks everyone for the discussion.
-
02-06-2013, 11:58 AM #16
-
02-06-2013, 04:10 PM #17
-
02-06-2013, 04:23 PM #18
-
02-06-2013, 05:57 PM #19Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 377
-
02-07-2013, 12:00 AM #20
-
02-07-2013, 12:36 AM #21
Xl, its generic crap. Unlabbelled junk if lucky filled with peptides.
You should seek pharm grade Edwin and stop trying to bs everyone, if you like it you carry on but no need to make stories up
-
02-07-2013, 10:22 PM #22
Tested my Blue Tops (Rip) today. In 30 seconds they turned milky white in boiling water. After 18 hours at room temperature its still cloudy/white. They denatured in heat and didn't renature at room temperature.
I went down to my pharmacist and ask if this a basic test that will work. "Said yes"Last edited by testluva; 02-07-2013 at 10:24 PM.
-
02-07-2013, 10:32 PM #23Originally Posted by testluva
Inject your product. Have a serum test for IGF-1 before you start and a second a few weeks after. If your IGF-1 increases significantly from baseline you can be more confident.
I don't care what the pharmacist tells you.
-
02-07-2013, 10:43 PM #24Originally Posted by MuscleInk
Last edited by testluva; 02-07-2013 at 10:47 PM.
-
02-07-2013, 10:57 PM #25Originally Posted by testluva
Elevated circulating GH increases the concentration of GH-dependent peptides such as IGF-1, IGF binding protein-3, and acid labile subunits (ALS). Thus, an observed increase in IGF-1 would occur as a result of increased circulating GH levels.
Just because a peptide denatures or not isn't definitive. One of the fundamental reasons GH is counterfeited is because conclusive tests are costly, not readily accessible by most and these make shift tests at home are far from conclusive. IMHO I think you're wasting your time with it and some of the most knowledgable members here have told you this. I'd give more credibility to Gixx, Boneparte, and the many other members who've weighed in on this. We all know that the vast majority of medical professionals are unfortunately ignorant on these topics.
I'd hate to see new, influential members thinking this simple home test is definitive proof and waste their money on bunk GH.
-
02-07-2013, 11:14 PM #26Originally Posted by MuscleInk
-
02-07-2013, 11:21 PM #27
i for one appreciate copy n paste stuff like that as i would never find that on my own
thank you muscleink
-
02-07-2013, 11:32 PM #28Originally Posted by dtob
-
02-07-2013, 11:41 PM #29Originally Posted by testluva
-
02-08-2013, 02:19 AM #30Originally Posted by MuscleInk
Let us know what your profession is? Maybe I need to be educated on who you are in the medical field and especially since you published research in a website blog.
-
02-08-2013, 02:41 AM #31Originally Posted by testluva
Sorry, I don't blog. I publish in peer reviewed medical journals.
Not sure where we are going with this. I wasn't trying to antagonize you testluva. If you want to hang your confidence on a home test for GH, that's your prerogative. I was simply raising some concern over the credibility of such tests which were denounced by other members here.
On this issue, our opinions diverge.
-
02-08-2013, 06:27 AM #32Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 419
-
02-08-2013, 06:57 AM #33
-
02-08-2013, 02:26 PM #34Banned
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- losing the plot,remember?
- Posts
- 916
a very cheap way of testing your HGH home is the SDS-Page. Just need the paper, some commasie blue gel and the kDa references. If your sample is around the 22kDa field and thick then you have 99.5% positive match for hgh. there are no peptides mimicking the hgh effects that are close to the 22kDa. you'll then have to worry just about the contaminants. surprisingly a big part of the chinese hgh are positive for hgh but still cause big water retention. it means the manufacture mixes the hgh with some water retention chemical. the whole idea the chinese can't make ugl hgh is false, the question is if they will sell the clean one.
-
02-08-2013, 04:11 PM #35Originally Posted by swithuk
My apologies for coming across as arrogant. I deal with ego-fanatical docs daily and their god complexes irritate me. Like every other member, I'm here to learn and educate, not come off as a pompous ass.
Testluva ad I had a chat on PM and everything is good. I appreciate the feedback and input on this thread. These discussions are insightful.
Cheers,
MI
-
02-08-2013, 04:33 PM #36
-
02-08-2013, 04:35 PM #37Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 419
-
02-08-2013, 07:43 PM #38
-
02-08-2013, 08:31 PM #39
-
02-08-2013, 09:03 PM #40Originally Posted by Granovich
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS