Thread: CJC-1295 DAC - Good or bad?
-
06-10-2014, 03:21 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 226
CJC-1295 DAC - Good or bad?
Hey,
So first off I am 29, running my 7th cycle and this is my first peptide cycle. Ive been doing some research and I am interested in CJC1295 DAC...
My goals are lean muscle and some fat loss.
Now first off ive read posts saying that DAC is not good because it causes GH bleed. But the more I research this... the more it seems like bro-science and not based on actual evidence. All the cycles people run with it claim great results.
Also... see the following article for some evidence that it causes no long term negative GH pulse issues:
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
Anyways... please weight in mates as I am all ears to info.
Thanks
-
06-11-2014, 05:53 PM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- oblivion
- Posts
- 466
I thought all cjc peps were replaced, for the most part, by mod grf (1-29)???
Know anything about DSIP?
-
06-12-2014, 07:27 AM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 226
-
06-12-2014, 07:56 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- oblivion
- Posts
- 466
Oh, i read that DAC more closely mimics the Gh release of a female. In men gh is naturally released in pulses as opposed to a bleed. Im going to go with ghrp-2/mod grf 1-29. I dont need a steady flow. There is somebody that gos by the name DATBTRUE. The reason i say that is because whoever this person is they write extensively on the peptides you're asking about. Google the name along with your peptide
Last edited by C3RB3RUS; 06-12-2014 at 07:59 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS