
Originally Posted by
Quester
Sub-cutaneous injections would be absorbed so slowly that correlating injections with nutrient timing pointless. I've been reading the same things that suggest what you are saying and this is why I have the question. I agree with the logic behind blood sugar levels and their relation to growth hormone/IGF production. An extension of this logic leads to the question: how can non-intravenous injections be worth while?
Therefore, intravenous injections would have to be the only way to go. Therefore, should the dosage be the same?