Hgh blood test results

[dude22]

Have some generic GH I bought and got a blood test done to rate quality. I took 10 ius 3 hours prior to test. I was NOT fasted and ate breakfast and had a protein shake containing carbs in that 3 hour window.

My results are: 8.9 ng/mL. I guess I did not get real GH.

[ScotchGuard02]

What was 8.9 mg/mL? IGF-1?

[dude22]

8.9 ng/mL was my result. I did not get igf levels because it would cost more and my assumption was after pinning 10 ius the GH levels alone would indicate if it was authentic.

[ScotchGuard02]

8.9 ng/mL has to be the measurement for something. What's that something?

[dude22]

Let me see if I can upload the result.

[dude22]

The test said "reference range 0-10 ng/mL"

[The Deadlifting Dog]

8.9 ng/mL has to be the measurement for something. What's that something?

He got an hGH test not an IGF-1 test.

[dude22]

[dude22]

I am considering getting another GH test, but this time fasting prior to the test. I have been doing some more research, and learned of the Growth Hormone Suppression Test. The idea behind this is to find out if levels of natural GH are higher than what's normal. In the test, they administer simple sugars prior to the test to raise blood sugar levels and insulin response. In a normal healthy adult GH levels should be under 1ng/mL after consuming the simple sugars. Well after consuming a shake with approx 40 grams simple sugars on the way to get my blood drawn (and breakfast 3 hours prior), I had 8.9 ng/mL levels. That seems high considering I should have had my levels knocked down after eating. I might spend the extra $45 on a new test considering a bought several kits and I would hate wasting them if I just screwed the test up.. ANY opinions, knowledge, experience with this PLEASE chime in.

[dude22]

Anybody have any knowledge at all of this test or anything I've posted?? Seems like I can't get one coherent answer to any of my questions lol. Is it really just a shot in the dark on these boards? Gotta have a vet or mod with some knowledge of this...

[ScotchGuard02]

8.9 out of 10 isn't bad. Have you tested without an HGH as a baseline? It's difficult to access if your HGH's good with 1 data point unless the reading is like 15 ng/Ml, way off the charts.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

8.9 out of 10 isn't bad. Have you tested without an HGH as a baseline? It's difficult to access if your HGH's good with 1 data point unless the reading is like 15 ng/Ml, way off the charts.

He pinned 10ius.
I am no expert but my guess is he should be well out of range with that amount.
Maybe he waited too long for the blood work?

[marcus300]

You should be a lot higher than that.
What make is your hgh?

[Mr.BB]

Guys, its 'generic'.

Hes lucky if its some peptide.

[dude22]

Guys, its 'generic'. Hes lucky if its some peptide.

Can you post any research or experience, other than bro-science which is based largely speculation and word of mouth, regarding your insistent theory that generics are ALWAYS fake? Because this is the POINT of the thread... To evaluate the actual legitimacy of the generic GH that I have. If we could have smarter "bros" on these boards that were willing to test these theories out, rather than chime in like a trained ****ing parrots, we would have better word of mouth advice on these boards.. I am posting what I bought, how much I took, where I got my test, and posted my results.. If you can please contribute something useful to this thread that would be fantastic. Any real world experience or even an attempt to answer one question I asked? Hold on, I am sure you are busy copying and pasting some one else's opinion as we speak.

[dude22]

Edit

[dude22]

So being fasted, or not being fasted, should have no impact on the results of an exogenous HGH test?