me natty 20inch arm

**balu4e** · 07-10-2006, 02:22 PM

Hi. I am new in the forum. Here are few pics of mine. I am natural bodybuilder. I have never taken anabolic steroids . I don't drink protein shakes. I have never tried creatine, glutamine, l-carnitin, fat burners and all the other stuff available on the market. I just eat and that's it. Here are my stats.

20years
6'2
230lb
arm: 19 1/4 cold and 20pumped
chest: 51 1/4
thigh: 28 3/4

waiting for comments...

**timtim** · 07-10-2006, 02:31 PM

very dense.

**SwoleCat** · 07-10-2006, 02:43 PM

Can't see much else, but it would be cool to see how big your arms could stay if/when you dropped excess bodyfat and were ripped/lean.

~SC~

**scriptfactory** · 07-10-2006, 03:10 PM

You look like you have a crazy peak in that one shot! Looking big!

Are you sure you're only 230lbs? I'm 6'1" and weigh 265lbs as of this morning but all of our stats are the same and we look to be roughly the same BF%. At 6'2" I don't see how you weigh so little, or maybe I just weigh a lot!

**Hellmaskbanned** · 07-10-2006, 03:16 PM

Originally Posted by scriptfactory

You look like you have a crazy peak in that one shot! Looking big!

Are you sure you're only 230lbs? I'm 6'1" and weigh 265lbs as of this morning but all of our stats are the same and we look to be roughly the same BF%. At 6'2" I don't see how you weigh so little, or maybe I just weigh a lot!

Thats what I was thinking ......Somethings fishy.

**StoneGRMI** · 07-10-2006, 04:03 PM

Looking big man. Go on a cut and you'll be ripped up.

**taylormade** · 07-10-2006, 04:12 PM

looking big

**chest6** · 07-10-2006, 04:24 PM

230? No way. I'm 225 right now..your height..and a LOT smaller than you mass wise. My bodyfat is a lot lower too..I'd put you at 16-20 from lookin at pics. I would think with those stats you would weigh more in the 260-270+ area..

**daytrader** · 07-10-2006, 05:15 PM

Originally Posted by chest6

230? No way. I'm 225 right now..your height..and a LOT smaller than you mass wise. My bodyfat is a lot lower too..I'd put you at 16-20 from lookin at pics. I would think with those stats you would weigh more in the 260-270+ area..

i agree... first time in a while we think a guy is heavier than he says lol.... but im about the same height as well... i remember bein 245lbs and the guys got a lot more mass than I..... btw does the first pic look a little odd.... either way good work thus far bro... impressive size for 20 and natural fa sho'

**DutchCowboy** · 07-10-2006, 06:24 PM

Arms look a lot smaller in your back pose. Hmmmm??? You gotta be more than 230 unless you are 5'2" not 6'2"

**ss01** · 07-10-2006, 06:29 PM

I'm 5'9" and 220 and my arms are 18"... There's big arms and then there's crazy stats.

**scriptfactory** · 07-10-2006, 06:46 PM

Wasn't Arnold a lean 230lbs at 6'2" and he didn't even have 20" arms?... His arms were 19 1/2" and 19" measured cold by Arthur Jones.

**END-RAGE** · 07-10-2006, 07:33 PM

can you give us an example of your diet?

**NEW_IN_THE_GAME** · 07-10-2006, 07:43 PM

at one time arnold was low bf, at 6'2 and had 23" arms and a 53" chest. This was his peak tho.

**Growingpains** · 07-10-2006, 07:45 PM

photoshop

If not then mad props man! You look thick!

GP

**albino-rhino** · 07-10-2006, 08:50 PM

Looking thick! But theres no way you only way 230lb even with little toothpick legs. I recommend you buy yourself a new scale.

Anyways good job! Cut up and you should look pretty damn good, it looks like you got some decent muscle under there.

**T3/T4 GSR** · 07-11-2006, 12:20 AM

Dude do us a favor....go on a serious cut and then run a bulk cycle....you will be huge!

**helium3** · 07-11-2006, 11:30 AM

yep a good cut would do it,arm size dont mean shit if they are fat,you have a good physique hiding there somewhere.

**Ntpadude** · 07-11-2006, 11:40 AM

Originally Posted by SwoleCat

Can't see much else, but it would be cool to see how big your arms could stay if/when you dropped excess bodyfat and were ripped/lean.

~SC~

You know that guy they had to knock a wall down to get him out of the house and use 2 forklifts to carry him out of his bed had 30 inch arms... but........

Dont you love these pictures where they show you the one thing they are really proud of but at the same time do a awful lot of hiding the gut, etc...

20 inch arms are really something if you can see obliques at least or can be proud of the rest of the complete picture.

**QUEBECBIGMAN** · 07-11-2006, 11:59 AM

Need to cut the fat my friend....you are really massif but when you look bether with your t-shurt on then with out cardio is the answer
you have great genetic ...only need to cut the fat

**Ntpadude** · 07-11-2006, 12:10 PM

Originally Posted by QUEBECBIGMAN

Need to cut the fat my friend....you are really massif but when you look bether with your t-shurt on then with out cardio is the answer
you have great genetic ...only need to cut the fat

Great genetics? OK if you say so. The one place in the human body that is extremely prone to "marbling fat within muscle" is the arms. Its not unusual for someone with 18 inch arms with 15% body fat to loose 1 inch in the arms by lowering their body fat to 10%. Almost everyone will loose arm size with a reduction of body fat even IF this same effect doesnt happen to legs, pecs, traps or lats. The arms are the most prone to size loss with body fat reduction of any location in the body. So to come in and show off big arms but also sport 25% body fat is just nothing to show off in this web site. Likewise almost all of us when on a bulking diet and gaining body fat will see rapid gains in arm size. This is why swole cat said, lets see you lean up good and then show us how big your arms are. Well that guy at 10% BF could probably have 14.5 inch arms and still loose no muscle.

**mwolffey** · 07-11-2006, 12:10 PM

i guess he disappeared....

**Hellmaskbanned** · 07-11-2006, 12:16 PM

Originally Posted by Ntpadude

Great genetics? OK if you say so. The one place in the human body that is extremely prone to "marbling fat within muscle" is the arms. Its not unusual for someone with 18 inch arms with 15% body fat to loose 1 inch in the arms by lowering their body fat to 10%. Almost everyone will loose arm size with a reduction of body fat even IF this same effect doesnt happen to legs, pecs, traps or lats. The arms are the most prone to size loss with body fat reduction of any location in the body. So to come in and show off big arms but also sport 25% body fat is just nothing to show off in this web site. Likewise almost all of us when on a bulking diet and gaining body fat will see rapid gains in arm size. This is why swole cat said, lets see you lean up good and then show us how big your arms are. Well that guy at 10% BF could probably have 14.5 inch arms and still loose no muscle.

He does have good genetics. He's natural with alot of muscle and yes he has some fat too, but so what? It's easier to lose fat than to gain muscle IMO.

**brjrj0000** · 07-11-2006, 12:23 PM

Originally Posted by Ntpadude

Great genetics? OK if you say so. The one place in the human body that is extremely prone to "marbling fat within muscle" is the arms. Its not unusual for someone with 18 inch arms with 15% body fat to loose 1 inch in the arms by lowering their body fat to 10%. Almost everyone will loose arm size with a reduction of body fat even IF this same effect doesnt happen to legs, pecs, traps or lats. The arms are the most prone to size loss with body fat reduction of any location in the body. So to come in and show off big arms but also sport 25% body fat is just nothing to show off in this web site. Likewise almost all of us when on a bulking diet and gaining body fat will see rapid gains in arm size. This is why swole cat said, lets see you lean up good and then show us how big your arms are. Well that guy at 10% BF could probably have 14.5 inch arms and still loose no muscle.

i dont my arms use to be around 19 and i lost like 35 pounds and they are still over 18 in a pretty short ammount of time i doubt he would really lose 5.5 inches from cutting

**brjrj0000** · 07-11-2006, 12:24 PM

Originally Posted by Ntpadude

Great genetics? OK if you say so. The one place in the human body that is extremely prone to "marbling fat within muscle" is the arms. Its not unusual for someone with 18 inch arms with 15% body fat to loose 1 inch in the arms by lowering their body fat to 10%. Almost everyone will loose arm size with a reduction of body fat even IF this same effect doesnt happen to legs, pecs, traps or lats. The arms are the most prone to size loss with body fat reduction of any location in the body. So to come in and show off big arms but also sport 25% body fat is just nothing to show off in this web site. Likewise almost all of us when on a bulking diet and gaining body fat will see rapid gains in arm size. This is why swole cat said, lets see you lean up good and then show us how big your arms are. Well that guy at 10% BF could probably have 14.5 inch arms and still loose no muscle.

i dont my arms use to be around 19 and i lost like 35 pounds and they are still over 18 in a pretty short ammount of time i doubt he would really lose 5.5 inches from cutting but yeah even b4 reading everyone elses post i did a double take when i saw what his height and weight were.

**scriptfactory** · 07-11-2006, 12:31 PM

Originally Posted by brjrj0000

i dont my arms use to be around 19 and i lost like 35 pounds and they are still over 18 in a pretty short ammount of time i doubt he would really lose 5.5 inches from cutting but yeah even b4 reading everyone elses post i did a double take when i saw what his height and weight were.

I doubt he would like 5 inches from cutting as well, but his arms in that side chest pose look fat as hell. He has zero definition, it's just one smooth lump so who knows... Also, his stats are suspect as hell...

**Grudge Keeper** · 07-11-2006, 05:12 PM

Originally Posted by NEW_IN_THE_GAME

at one time arnold was low bf, at 6'2 and had 23" arms and a 53" chest. This was his peak tho.

I dont care what anyone says i dont believe arnold ever had 23 " arms and I bet if this guy did cut he would lose bout 3 inchs

**scriptfactory** · 07-11-2006, 05:16 PM

Originally Posted by Grudge Keeper

I dont care what anyone says i dont believe arnold ever had 23 " arms

That's because he didn't. Ronnie has a lean 24" arm and Arnold doesn't have arms even CLOSE to as large as his...

**Bench Machine** · 07-11-2006, 05:35 PM

I dont think there is no way this dude is natty anyway. How much a-50's a day do you take.

**SwoleCat** · 07-11-2006, 07:44 PM

He only has 1 post here and this is it. Looks like he came to show off but didn't like the responses?

~SC~

**Surfstud18** · 07-11-2006, 07:54 PM

Well his legs don't look that big so he might be right some guys have huge upper bodies cause that's all they work out and they have small wheels just an idea lol

**TADOLFI** · 07-11-2006, 07:57 PM

Originally Posted by SwoleCat

He only has 1 post here and this is it. Looks like he came to show off but didn't like the responses?

~SC~

YEP!
Ain't no kiddie board!

**rake922** · 07-11-2006, 07:59 PM

Originally Posted by Surfstud18

Well his legs don't look that big so he might be right some guys have huge upper bodies cause that's all they work out and they have small wheels just an idea lol

His legs aren't even in the pics...