
Originally Posted by
Undecided09
I wanted to say what Nark was saying, but I have a hard time going against virtually anything B D says...that being said, eating less doesn't equate to losing weight, if that were the case, we would all just eat 100 cals a day when we wanted to get skinny...Convincing girls that you need to eat more to look better is probably the hardest thing to do,but its the truth. As it has been stated, the quality of calories is much more important than the total amount...If the cals coming in consist of high amounts of protein, complex carbs, and healthy fats, then there is no reason why 2500 cals a day, while trying to lose BF can't be done...On another note, weight is not indicitive of appearance. You could weigh more and look alot better than you do now...Losing weight doesn't equate to a good look, the amount of LBM you can gain, and the amount of fat you can cut is what is going to make you look lean, well defined, and curvy...As I'm sure Nark will tell you, he "looks" the biggest when he weighs the least. How could that be??? Its because his BF is so low, the only thing that is left is his phenominal muscle base...If you are putting on muscle and losing fat you are going to weight more, or stay relatively the same in weight, but your appearance will be leaps and bounds better, and isn't that the goal of any diet?? Who cares if you weight 110 if you look like shit? The look is the goal of any diet, not the weight, and as I already stated, the weight isn't always indicative of the look....
~M.A.D.