Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
02-15-2016, 10:15 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 36
Need some advice
Just wanted to share some pictures with you all and hopefully get an estimate of my body fat percentage. Also wanted to know where I should begin, should I lose some fat then start eating like a horse? Or should I start eating right away as I am now?
Also Keep in mind Im flexing in some and not in others.
Lastly here are a few other things to consider,
1.) Im 19 and wont start using AAS until about 23-24ish
2.) Im 5'9 150lbs
Thanks for the help!!!
-
02-15-2016, 10:29 AM #2
Hello buddy.
At a guess from just your front torso, id put you at 15-17% or so. Youve got that skinny/fat look going on, with no offence intended. You're narrow on the hips and ribs, but theres clearly some fat around the belly button area. Good starting point though, nothing that couldnt be corrected in short order with a change in diet.
In all honesty, at your age and stats. Id hit the diet section and read over some of the diets in there, and create your own diet thread there.
You'll get lots of invaluable feedback. Id suggest eating around maintenance for a period, along with training to see how you respond. We can then flex up or down the calories as needed.
Im glad you've said that you'll leave the AAS alone for the time being. You've got a great frame for starting with. No need to mess with your system.
Get that thread up in the diet section and I'll see you there!
-Krugerr
-
02-15-2016, 10:34 AM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Posts
- 36
Alright Will do thank you!
-
02-16-2016, 04:18 AM #4
I agree with kruger, looking about 15-16%
-
02-16-2016, 04:44 AM #5Originally Posted by TheTaxMan
Refreshing to have someone listen and not make excuses.
Sent from my iPhone using App
-
02-16-2016, 04:52 AM #6
K said pretty much the same things I was already thinking before I started commenting. So do what he said. he knows his sh!t.
I will add that I am 45. I started doing AAS at 19 or 20. I should have waited. I know that now. I did not harm myself, but could have. I may have been a half inch or an inch taller (AAS close your epiphyseal plates early) but I ended up at 6 feet even and that's fine with me. What I regret about my choice back then is that I should have trained naturally to get the base, get to where you aren't really gaining more weight anymore and strength gains come very slowly. You will hit several plateus on your journey. I am not talking about those. I am talking about after you have already been through all of that and are at or near your natural limits. That is when you are most primed for AAS.
Get the dietary and training discipline down first. You can look damned good without AAS. And you do have a great starting frame. Some people are blocky, wide all over. Others have thin shoulders, and thin hips and they will never have a prime V taper. You have a good V shape already. That is genetic. Consider yourself lucky.
When you get up to about 195 or so at sub 15% BF you may even change your mind about AAS use. You can certainly achieve that without AAS. That would be about when you would need to decide if you want to join the dark side or not. You will at that point have all of the other tools in your box. AAS are only a very small part of bodybuilding. IMO Diet is more than half the equation. I say it is about 70% dietary, 20% training and rest (don't forget REST, that is when growth occurs), and 10% supplements whether AAS or OTC. You can do everything right, but if you don't get the diet right you will either make no gains at all, or be a very strong fat ass.Last edited by Java Man; 02-16-2016 at 04:57 AM.
-
02-16-2016, 05:02 AM #7
I can't find the study, but it is on PubMed. Test E was given to 3 groups. All things were equal in the groups except weight training habits. Age group, diet, sleeping habits, and supplements were all the same for all 3 groups.
One group trained daily with high intensity. Another trained a few times per week with moderate intensity. the third group DID NOT TRAIN AT ALL.
The first two groups gained about the same amount of muscle mass. 7 lbs or something like that. the 3rd group, who did not train at all, gained almost as much. they measured Lean mass gain. not total weight. Shows that training is in fact not the primary component. If I can find it I will link it.
Oh yeah and of course they were all maleLast edited by Java Man; 02-16-2016 at 05:10 AM.
-
02-16-2016, 06:09 AM #8
Yea i agree, its becoming to often seeing "i dont care what you say im doing 600mg tren starting tomorrow without test"
Great to see some people being mature and listening to the advice given
-
02-16-2016, 06:38 AM #9
Listen to these guys and at this point your bf shouldn't be a concern. You have a good foundation. Hit the nutrition section and get a good meal plan going along with good training. You will make great gains.
-
02-16-2016, 07:22 AM #10
I found it. There was an article written about this study published in MM2K way back in the mid 90's back when it was still respectable and hadn't sold out yet to become another M&F clone.
The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men. - PubMed - NCBI
Check this out too, which is where I found the link that led me to it on NCBI. There are some good links on this page that would lead to years worth of respectable sourced reading via cross linking ad nauseum:
Anabolic Steroids and Muscle Growth : Bodyrecomposition
Here is the interesting and relevant part on that page where a chart is made regarding the results of the study:
Originally Posted by BODYRECOMPOSITION.COM from a study at PubMedLast edited by Java Man; 02-16-2016 at 07:33 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS