Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Pakistan: U.S. Intelligence Used in Attack on Terror Training Facility

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740

    Pakistan: U.S. Intelligence Used in Attack on Terror Training Facility

    Pakistan: U.S. Intelligence Used in Attack on Terror Training Facility

    KHAR, Pakistan — Pakistan admitted Tuesday that the military used intelligence from U.S.-led coalition forces in a helicopter attack that left 80 people dead, but that U.S. forces did not participate in the operation on what was described as an Al Qaeda-linked training camp.

    "Intelligence sharing was definitely there, but to say they (the coalition) have carried out the operation, that is absolutely wrong," Maj. Gen. Shaukat Sultan, the chief army spokesman, said.

    Sultan's clarification came after ABC News reported that a U.S. Predator drone fired into the compound after intelligence pointed to the possibility that Al Qaeda's No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri was present at the location.

    Click here to go to the ABC report.

    Another Pakistani official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Zawahiri and the terror leader behind the plot to blow up trans-Atlantic airliners had frequented the religious school in Chingai village, but were not there when the attack was carried out.

    The official did not say when Zawahiri or Abu Ubaidah al-Masri, the Egyptian who allegedly heads Al Qaeda's operations in eastern Afghanistan, had last visited the school.

    Thousands of angry tribesmen decried both governments over the killings Tuesday.

    Sultan said his government received intelligence as part of long-standing cooperation with the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan to battle terrorists operating along the porous border between the countries.

    In Kabul, Col. Tom Collins, a U.S. military spokesman, said it is common knowledge that the United States, Pakistan and Afghanistan share intelligence as part of a three-way military agreement. But he said he had no information regarding the recent operation in Pakistan.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tampa,Montreal,Paris
    Posts
    4,186
    The pakistani governement denies every association with the US in any military venture for obvious domestic reasons. Nonetheless I presume the cooperation is vast and extensive. Musharraf is walking a fine line between political death and physical death, where he cant appease the west wholeheartedly nor the mullahs. Is he a lesser of two evils? The second one being the electorate winner which will be held in a few years I believe

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Prada
    The pakistani governement denies every association with the US in any military venture for obvious domestic reasons. Nonetheless I presume the cooperation is vast and extensive. Musharraf is walking a fine line between political death and physical death, where he cant appease the west wholeheartedly nor the mullahs. Is he a lesser of two evils? The second one being the electorate winner which will be held in a few years I believe
    I did not realize that Musharraf has had 6 attepmts on his life.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tampa,Montreal,Paris
    Posts
    4,186
    Im not sure if youre being facetious but I thought is was around 3 attempts.
    The question really is if he goes..........then god knows who will be in charge of the government, security, policy and most importantly those nukes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Prada
    Im not sure if youre being facetious but I thought is was around 3 attempts.
    The question really is if he goes..........then god knows who will be in charge of the government, security, policy and most importantly those nukes.
    No, I seriously did not know that he had that many attempts on his life. If he goes, damn. Remember, they do have nukes........
    Last edited by Logan13; 10-31-2006 at 03:20 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Wont be cool if fundamentalists get control.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    Wont be cool if fundamentalists get control.
    Correct, and all of the sanctions in the world will not stop these people at that point...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Logan13
    Correct, and all of the sanctions in the world will not stop these people at that point...
    offcourse not, sanctions cant stop what they already posess.

    So do you propose bombing them I mean why wait

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tampa,Montreal,Paris
    Posts
    4,186
    If he can isolate them, quarantine them within his borders then I guess it would be satisfactory. The biggest threat, more then Iraq and N. Korea, IMO, is Fundamentalists taking power in a coup d'etat or assasination. I really, really hope the admin has some contingency plan

  10. #10
    Pakistan could get back the democracy they had before Musharrafs's coup

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    offcourse not, sanctions cant stop what they already posess.

    So do you propose bombing them I mean why wait
    Oh no, we could not do that until they nuke a city. And than, only maybe....And of course if they do nuke a city, it will not be their fault, it will be the US's fault. Sorry, but this exaggeration of your point looks much more silly than mine......
    But I still care about you as a human being.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Logan13
    Oh no, we could not do that until they nuke a city. And than, only maybe....And of course if they do nuke a city, it will not be their fault, it will be the US's fault. Sorry, but this exaggeration of your point looks much more silly than mine......
    But I still care about you as a human being.
    I love you to

    But to be serious, the world would be in deep shit if some fundamentalist ****s do get there greedy hands on the buttons. Maby India would solve that with some quiet assasinations. Im sure china would be equaly concerned.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    I love you to

    But to be serious, the world would be in deep shit if some fundamentalist ****s do get there greedy hands on the buttons. Maby India would solve that with some quiet assasinations. Im sure china would be equaly concerned.
    Yes, my first concern would be with the strained relationship between Pakistan and India, since both are obviously nuclear.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •